Last edited by josykay; 2019-02-21 at 02:35 PM.
Look up bangladeshi citizenship laws.
Is Shamima Begum entitled to Bangladeshi citizenship?
B y Clive Coleman, BBC legal correspondent
Lawyers have told the BBC that under Bangladesh law, a UK national born to a Bangladeshi parent is automatically a Bangladeshi citizen - a dual national - but the Bangladeshi authorities assert that's not the case for Ms Begum.
Under this "blood line" law, Bangladeshi nationality and citizenship lapse when a person reaches the age of 21, unless they make active efforts to retain it.
So, it is Ms Begum's age, 19, that is likely - in part - to have given Home Office lawyers and the home secretary reassurance there was a legal basis for stripping her of her UK citizenship.
In 2017, the government lost an appeal case brought by two British citizens of Bangladeshi origin who were stripped of their citizenship when they were abroad.
The Special Immigration Appeals Commission ruled that E3 and N3 had not tried to retain their citizenship before they reached the age of 21, and so it had automatically lapsed.
That meant that the decision to strip them of their UK citizenship had rendered them stateless.
Ms Begum's case is different. Her Bangladeshi citizenship, if established, would remain intact until she reaches 21, even if she has never visited the country or made active efforts to retain her citizenship.
Source https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc...mp/uk-47312207
Bangladesh can posture all they want, but under there law they already consider her a citizen untill she's 21.
Read the laws relevant to the nations involved befor you pass comment on nations you don't understand please. Its tireing having to past in laws just to educate people more than capable of educating themselves.
Just because you don't like something, or think it's immoral doesn't mean we can't do it.
This is a matter that doesn't concern you and you have no say in anyway. So but out and let's deal with our terrorists under our laws.
Last edited by Monster Hunter; 2019-02-21 at 02:45 PM.
of course he doesOriginally Posted by EveningStandard
/sigh
Originally Posted by Jezza
Under what possible reasoning or course of events should no action be taken?
Last edited by rogueMatthias; 2019-02-21 at 03:27 PM.
BASIC CAMPFIRE for WARCHIEF UK Prime Minister!
She let go of her rights as a british citizen when she joined a fanatic terrorist organisation out of her own volition
Of course it doesn't. But a prison sentence is more than enough. Also, generally speaking, capital punishment for treason is unusual is not allowed in european nations either. So I do not get the thirst for blood, that would demonstrate a plain violation of laws, the state is supposed to uphold.
Last edited by rogueMatthias; 2019-02-21 at 04:01 PM.
BASIC CAMPFIRE for WARCHIEF UK Prime Minister!
This.
Let her find her own way back. No lives should be risked to go get her. And if she does make it back, she should have to face consequences. You don't just stroll back into your old life as if nothing happened after you willingly ran off, betrayed your county, and joined/ran around with a terrorist organization for 4+ years.
What if she actually does make it back there, perhaps under the radar, and manage (before or after release from prison according to how the stealthing went) to spread her virulent, hateful ideology and perhaps even carry out an attack?
What stops the secret services from doing their job, such as making a terrible accident happen to her, or just downright suicide or vanish her?
What do british laws say regarding making a person stateless? That's really what I'm wondering here because she's born British and have only had a British citizenship to this day no?
Sadly, but I am amused at all this. Both the outrage (so much of it fake) and how the countries are squirming to avoid any responsibility. After all, politicians care about being reelected...
Plus the whole stateless thing, gonna laugh if the British (and USA's too, for that matter) goverment cannot prove they have dual citizenships. That's gonna be fun.
P.S.
I also could ask why all the special services failed to notice and stop the radicalisation, why 15 year olds could even get to Syria without guardians in the first place, or how teen psychology and brainwashing works (with adding stuff from annals of history), but, alas, such things would not be taken kindly there
The terrorist herself: 'I don't regret coming here', 'severed head didn't haze me, I thought of what would the guy do to Muslim womynz if he had a chance'
These forums: 'look at the nuances, you peasants with torches and pitchforks, maybe she changed and doesn't pose a threat'
Nice to see people jumping to defend human scum who willingly joined one of the worst terrorist groups out there, and supported (if not participated) in murder of tens of thousands of people, and only wants out now that her terrorist buddies are about to get wiped out.
Much better to see UK growing balls and letting the scum suffer the consequences of her choices.