How is the term Alliance entitlement not a thing?
It very much seems an analogy to what you all know I am referring to.
How is the term Alliance entitlement not a thing?
It very much seems an analogy to what you all know I am referring to.
That's not really what I said at all. Well done on missing the point which was, if you played the other faction, maybe you'd see that you're full of nonsense.
Yup. I love that gryphon model. It really sucks that Horde can't get it. I think I need to complain.
The fact that they have to address this in Q&A's doesn't prove "mount bias" given an entirely plausible alternate explanation: Some people just have a strong tendency to be jealous of the things they don't have - and it has nothing to do with reason or logic.
Like I already said, to me this whole complaint is just puerile. It's the kind of thing I see happening with my kids who are 11. At least they should grow out of it.
Easy dont buy it, and if you feel forced to buy it, 50k is easy to farm.
At least it isn't more horses? We've got flying horses already, surprised they didn't just add glowing hooves and called it a day.
Is it objective? The hippo mount on Alliance is unique, with a reused asset on the Horde side. Just like the Horde gets an updated wolf for Mag'har, while Alliance gets a new corehound (the skeleton is reused, yes). Even if it was objective, what's also objective is that Blizzard spent more time on Kul'tirans than all other allied races combined, which is actually confirmed by Ion. Yet somehow the Horde gets accused of receiving biased treatment there aswell.
Also, all 3 Horde rep mounts have alternate versions obtainable for the Alliance. 2 of them can be grinded out from leveling zones, the Prerodaxx is obtaiend from BoD meta achievement or Kua'fon. Which brings me to the next point, Kua'fon is fucking useable by both factions, it's not an extra mount. Not to mention that stuff for the bee mount has been datamined for 8.2. Which might end up meaning that the Alliance's "extra" mount is unique again, while Horde gets a reused asset.
As for the 50k mount debate, the Horde ones are recolors of the BoD meta reward mount, the Zandalari rep mount and Kua'fon. So if we look at it objectively, the Alliance gryphons actually have less recolors than the Horde ones. Since we're being objective and all.
These bias whine posts drive me freaking crazy, dude. E: I agree that the 3 horses from reps were bad, peopel just need to stop pretending like it's the only piece of content they got this expansion.
Last edited by ophion1990; 2019-04-18 at 01:38 PM.
They just need to update the rig and mesh of dragons, birds and cloaks in general...
Would be nice if they took another crack at redesigning gryphons. The MoP remodel never really captured the look of the original imo which are still some of my favorite simple mounts but so outdated and ugly by todays standards.
Really, I don't know what you're on about. It's like you're purposely trying to misconstrue strange meaning into what I am saying while completely missing the obvious just so that you can have an argument.
As I already said, it's pretty clear that the OP is whining about "horde bias" and that is the point I am taking issue with.
They probably took whatever the new / unique mount was going to be and are going to put it on the in game store. That's the version of Blizzard we have these days.
And your argument is weak, your counter examples are equivalent, and you are purposefully not looking at the facts. Good job I guess?
The mounts this expansion lack variation and quality on the Alliance side - if you can't see that then you're blind. I don't give a shit how long you wanted a Tiger, that argument doesn't make any sense in the context of this discussion.
Okay, looking through all the mounts, ignoring ones that both factions can obtain:
NPC Factions rewards:
Alliance gets 3 horses
Horde gets a hyena, blood swarmer, pterrordax
horde gets better variety and newer mounts overall
Allied Racial Mounts
Alliance gets a horse and a unique corehound
Horde gets a direhorn and wolf
Unique corehound wins this one for alliance
PvP Ranked Mounts
Both factions get a basilisk
Alliance gets two warsabers and a hippo
Horde gets two warhorses and a clefthoof
Hippo wins this one for alliance
Everything else is either obtainable from both sides or has equivalence on both sides, or is not unique to BFA and not worth mentioning.
It looks like Horde has a very slight advantage on unique mounts thanks to the NPC factions, however it could also be argued that alliance have a very slight advantage because the Hippo is one of a kind as of right now, where everything else has multiple versions.
TL;DR... this is not really a clear lean one way or the other, why are we complaining about it?