Originally Posted by
Sezh
A masterpiece? Jesus christ. All right, let me try to explain why I have problems with it.
- Ever since the dothraki were introduced, people in the show and us, the viewers, have asked themselves "What will they do if they win the war? They can't rape and pillage in Dany's new utopia. To solve this issue, the writers decided to solve this issue by having the cavalry charge headfirst into the enemy and just be killed off. Despite it goes against any sane military strategy, and we know that the character Tyrion and several others in the gang are supposed to be intelligent strategists. This character trait was abandonded so the writers could solve a story problem.
- The thing that made GoT special when it was based on GRRMs work was that no character was safe. Not because he liked to kill off characters for shock value, but because he wrote the world as unforgiving. If you found yourself in a situation where you are likely to die - you die. The show didn't care about which characters the audience liked or didn't like. People died as natural consequences of their actions and the actions of others. In this episode, some "beloved B characters" die, sure. But the majority live. Jaime lives, even though he's not a great fighter anymore, whilst tens of thousands are slaughtered next to him on the front lines. Would he have survived if this was real? No. Why did he? Cause the writers wanted him to. Why did Beric die? Cause the writers know "someone's got to die" so they decided he was no longer impactful. No one lived or died because of what they did, they lived or died because the writers pulled the strings behind the scenes. GRRM never did that.
- Remember the abyssmal storyline where the Avengers of Ice and Fire ventured beyond the wall? They held their own against the entire undead army for a pretty long while. They were ~10 people. Now an army of tens of thousands is obliterated within minutes. The power of the undead army is not consistent, it is used as a plot device.
- How did Arya kill the NK? We saw her power against he zombies earlier in the episode, sure she fought well against them but she has no magic tricks to use against them. And then when the NK is surrounded by hundreds of zombies and his generals, she somehow manages to sneak past them (with powers she demonstrably did not have mere 20 minutes earlier) and Mortal Kombat jump the NK and kill him? It's cheap. It's a cop out. They didn't know how to setup the kill, so they didn't even try to make it realistic.
- The whole plan. Aren't some of the worlds greatest minds gathered in this group of fighters against the dead? Was really the plan all along just to make a final stand and all die? And then whops someone luckily got the kill. They could have done so much more with it. Of course the NK would walk up to Bran when he felt he had won, but the heroes could have been aware of this. They could have constructed a plan that required enormous sacrifice to draw him out and kill him, but that didn't happen. They had no plan, they just died and died and died and then they won through luck (read; through the power or script writing).
- Why is the NK after Bran? Why does he want to kill him personally? What is his grudge against him? They tell us that NK wants him to die cause the memory of humans die with him. But why does he have to do it personally? I tell you why; because the writers don't know how else to present a scene in which he dies. And it's poor and lazy writing. I'm not saying I have the answer to what they could have done, but it feels like they just gave up even trying.
- - - Updated - - -
Some of us complain because it has now become a generic fantasy movie. It didn't used to be, now it is.