Originally Posted by
Drutt
The circumstances surrounding his death are plausible if each event happened in isolation.
A camera in a prison facility failing? Plausible.
Two cameras in a prison facility failing? Less plausible, but not impossible.
Two specific cameras in a facility failing, both pointing at the same cell? Much less likely. If it was due to a failure of a single part further upstream, it should have knocked out more than just those two cameras. Based on what we know, it was only the two on Epstein's cell which failed. At that point, if you've eliminated an upstream failure then you're left with the idea that two specific cameras both happened to fail within the same tiny window. As someone who works with AV infrastructure among other stuff, I personally find that highly unlikely. It would be far more believable if e.g. all of the cameras on that particular block had failed - that way you could suggest it was down to a failure on a shared infrastructure piece the cameras connect back to (n.b. I don't know how jail CCTV is wired so it's not impossible there is no single point of failure).
A guard falling asleep when overworked? Very plausible. Two guards falling asleep at the same time? Much less likely but not impossible.
When looked at as a collective, however, what we are left with is a situation where, in order to believe that Epstein killed himself, you have to accept that two cameras independently failed, two guards simultaneously fell asleep right as the cameras failed, and Epstein happened to try and commit suicide during the tiny window that the two sleeping guards and two failed cameras provided.
It's not impossible, but it's highly implausible and should have been fully investigated. There's certainly no way we can say he was definitely killed, but we're being asked to believe in an enormous number of coincidences here without a full inquiry being held. The fact it was buttoned up so fast only adds another suspicious bullet point.