1. #13181
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    You also had 10 to 1 he wouldn’t be impeached. You should talk to Trump about opening another casino so you can be his odds maker.
    I said the 10 to 1 over the Mueller report, He wasn't impeached over Russiagate. You really have a hard time with a timeline don't you?

  2. #13182
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    No, you just said impeached. You’re retroactively adding qualifiers to both.
    Go back and find it, it was during the Mueller stuff and I even clarified it for you but you insist on being wrong. If you don't believe me I really don't care, I know what I said and what I meant.

  3. #13183
    Quote Originally Posted by zenkai View Post
    Go back and find it, it was during the Mueller stuff and I even clarified it for you but you insist on being wrong. If you don't believe me I really don't care, I know what I said and what I meant.
    Why not just find it and prove it yourself if you're so sure?

    Dontrike/Shadow Priest/Black Cell Faction Friend Code - 5172-0967-3866

  4. #13184
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    I get you want to move goalposts, but this was your exact statement. If you were running a casino by law you’d have to pay out.
    Again learn timelines, it was about/during the Mueller report, if you really can't understand that then I feel sorry for you.

  5. #13185
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    If you meant it only in reference to the Mueller report you should have said so. All you said was 10 to 1 he wouldn’t be impeached. It doesn’t matter if it was in a Mueller thread, that’s a blanket statement.
    Not everything has to be spelled out, it's a forum not a contract. It was on topic in the MUELLER report, it's sad you can't put two and two together and when I explain my position you double down. You're trying to tell me what I meant when I wrote something, you know ignorant and arrogant that sounds?

  6. #13186
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    Roflmao, you were literally offering to take bets. Based on your wording, you lose. It’s fun how you think, “yeaah but what I meant was,” changes what you actually stated.
    No, I already explained it, you're either incapable of understanding or dishonest, either way I don't care, believe what you will, it makes me laugh.

  7. #13187
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    Yeah, I understand how bets work. If you want to qualify something in one you have to do so up front. Good luck with your sloppy communication skills. Maybe you’ll be president some day.
    Actually you don't If I took a bet on a horse race and your horse lost but won a race 1 year down the road you would try to collect your money. I recommend not going to "Vegas" roflmao

  8. #13188
    Quote Originally Posted by zenkai View Post
    Actually you don't If I took a bet on a horse race and your horse lost but won a race 1 year down the road you would try to collect your money. I recommend not going to "Vegas" roflmao
    Cept that's the wrong analogy here. You didn't go to a horse race and go hey I'm betting on this horse to win the race. You wrote/said something and now that you lost are trying to retroactively correct it. Trump was impeached. You made zero specifications about when or why. Either you're telling the truth and under contact law you'd still be on the hook because it's your responsibility to know what you're proposing or you're a liar trying to move goal posts.

    Either way fault rests pretty squarely with you for wording it poorly.
    “Logic: The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding.”
    "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others."
    Ambrose Bierce
    The Bird of Hermes Is My Name, Eating My Wings To Make Me Tame.

  9. #13189
    Quote Originally Posted by shimerra View Post
    Cept that's the wrong analogy here. You didn't go to a horse race and go hey I'm betting on this horse to win the race. You wrote/said something and now that you lost are trying to retroactively correct it. Trump was impeached. You made zero specifications about when or why. Either you're telling the truth and under contact law you'd still be on the hook because it's your responsibility to know what you're proposing or you're a liar trying to move goal posts.

    Either way fault rests pretty squarely with you for wording it poorly.
    I wrote it in a Mueller thread before the Ukraine stuff sorry if you can't figure that out. lol

  10. #13190
    Quote Originally Posted by zenkai View Post
    I wrote it in a Mueller thread before the Ukraine stuff sorry if you can't figure that out. lol
    And you're bitching about it here . Sorry you're shit at contacts and could apparently be out negotiated by a toddler. Trying saying what you mean in a written format. Sorry you can't figure that out!

    You made a standing bet that Trump would not be impeached. You were not clear. The issue is with you for writing an ambiguous statement and getting butthurt when people use that against you.


    Whatever happened to conservatives and personal responsibility?
    “Logic: The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding.”
    "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others."
    Ambrose Bierce
    The Bird of Hermes Is My Name, Eating My Wings To Make Me Tame.

  11. #13191
    The Unstoppable Force Belize's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gen-OT College of Shitposting
    Posts
    21,940
    Quote Originally Posted by shimerra View Post

    Whatever happened to conservatives and personal responsibility?
    Haaaaaa hahahaha. That's a pretty funny joke.

  12. #13192
    Quote Originally Posted by shimerra View Post
    And you're bitching about it here . Sorry you're shit at contacts and could apparently be out negotiated by a toddler. Trying saying what you mean in a written format. Sorry you can't figure that out!

    You made a standing bet that Trump would not be impeached. You were not clear. The issue is with you for writing an ambiguous statement and getting butthurt when people use that against you.


    Whatever happened to conservatives and personal responsibility?
    In a topic during the Mueller investigation. Sorry you don't understand topics work. lol

  13. #13193
    Like it has been pointed out already, it's hard to even see the rails at this point. Please return to discussing the impeachment. Such as it is.

  14. #13194
    Senate Intel Committee to call the whistleblower to testify. Not John Bolton, the whistleblower.

    https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/g...wer-to-testify

    Graham Says Senate Intel Committee Will Call Whistleblower To Testify

  15. #13195
    Quote Originally Posted by Levelfive View Post
    Senate Intel Committee to call the whistleblower to testify. Not John Bolton, the whistleblower.

    https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/g...wer-to-testify

    Graham Says Senate Intel Committee Will Call Whistleblower To Testify
    Makes sense gotta find out if the Whistleblower once held the door open for Clinton and drag their name through the mud! Make sure everyone knows what happens when you go against the god king!

  16. #13196
    The never trumpers are at it again, this time with a scathing ad on McSally. It's even more brutal then the ad they have on Collins.


  17. #13197
    I'm not saying this to make fun of their looks, but why is it that most, if not all, of the women who are clearly on the Trump bandwagon, look like the life has been sucked out of them - literally?

    Sarah Huckabee Sanders is barely older than I am, and yet, she looks like she's well into her 40s.
    Kellyanne Conway and McSally both look share similar traits.

    I guess when you are toxic and hold hate on your heart, it is also projected outward in their appearance as well. Such a shame, too.
    Looking for <Good Quotes for Signature>.

  18. #13198
    Schiffs argument is very strong.

  19. #13199
    The Unstoppable Force Belize's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gen-OT College of Shitposting
    Posts
    21,940
    Quote Originally Posted by Themius View Post
    Schiffs argument is very strong.
    Does it matter?

    The jury already made up their mind.

  20. #13200
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    40,024
    Quote Originally Posted by Levelfive View Post
    Senate Intel Committee to call the whistleblower to testify.
    It's going to be dangerous to flat-out say "no", even though there are laws for exactly that. It will be called a coverup, even though the Party of Law and Order should not say following the law is a coverup.

    So instead, the only way to follow through is to have the Senate write out questions ahead of time, and let the whistleblower's lawyer answer them.

    It was good enough for Trump, so it's good enough here.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •