I fully support the death penalty. But such punishment should be reserved for cases where we know for sure.
Yeah, thats not good enough.
Inmates are known to lie, for a lot of reasons. Its not unheard of for an inmate to embellish their own alleged crimes for clout when your living amongst in a rough environment. Inmates will conspire against others with "he said she said" for a number of petty reasons.
Unless there's actual evidence to support the claims then the claims are all just talk.
Locking the man up for life, I could live with if I had to. I do understand locking up someone on conspiracy/involvement charges. We shouldn't be killing people on shaky evidence.
Resident Cosplay Progressive
He didn't pull the trigger but he not only didn't try to stop his buddy he bragged about being part of the crime? I fail to see why I should be outraged.
Who's word? Did you read the story?
"The state offered the testimony of 39 witnesses at Woods' capital murder trial, including Officer Michael Collins, 25 other law enforcement officers, and forensic experts," Ivey wrote in a lengthy statement announcing Woods' execution. "There is no evidence, and no argument has been made, that Nathaniel Woods tried to stop the gunman from committing these heinous crimes. In fact, he later bragged about his participation in these horrific murders. As such, the jury did not view Woods' acts as those of an innocent bystander; they believed that he was a fully engaged participant."
Are you calling law enforcement and forensic experts convicted criminals?
The claim involving him bragging was supported by inmates. I'd just as soon dismiss 39 witnesses when only three people remained alive to witness the shooting and the GUNMAN confessed to being the sole shooter.
I won't dispute the claim that he didn't try to stop the shooter. Still having a hard time seeing how that proves he killed them.
Wonder if the victims being cops influenced this decision.
Wait, you accused me of believing the word of convicted criminals but you believe his buddy, the shooter? How did you know they both didn't shoot and his buddy was just taken the fall. It's not unheard of for 2 people to commit a crime and one to take the fall. Like I said even if he didn't pull the trigger he was still part of it, he lured the officers to their death according to BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51766516
Prosecutors said it was Spencer who had opened fire on the officers but accused Woods of luring the officers.
Sounds like they got him on being part of it
Well that would depend on the Jury? I don't know, if it was cops, nuns, or whatever I still can't feel sorry for him.
Wonder if the victims being cops influenced this decision.
I don't see much of the difference in luring someone to their death vs pulling the trigger.
Also https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/facts-a...hable-by-death
Many states allow all those who participated in a felony in which a death occurred to be charged with murder and possibly face the death penalty, even though they may not have directly killed anyone. The case of unarmed accomplices in a bank robbery in which an employee is killed is a typical example of felony murder. Since the death penalty is supposed to be reserved for the “worst of the worst” cases, legislatures or the courts could restrict its use only to those who directly participated in killing the victim. Prisoners have also raised claims that the aggravating circumstances that make a crime eligible for the death penalty are too broad, with some state death-penalty laws encompassing nearly all murders, rather than reserving the death penalty for a small subset of murders.
Yes, because he was a witness to the crime. Those would be circumstances I could get behind. Especially if it stops a person who didn't fire a single one of the shots that killed the victims. It is also quite unheard of for criminals to not roll over on each other. Just look at our current administration.
The story involving him luring the police was never corroborated. In this instance you are just taking the word of the officer. I am saying it sounds like these police were out for blood.
As for the sentence, the jury wasn't unanimous so ultimately it was the trial judge who sentenced him to death, not his peers.
Seems like we should have stricter guidelines for sentencing people to death especially if they did not actually pull the trigger.
And as so many have argued here, it has nothing to do with justice, but with a bloodlust for revenge, ergo, the laws suck and are applied to the maximum while basic logic dictates otherwise.
The fcking shooter is alive himself, still. Does THAT not make it even more retarded?