Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
The decision of EHCR is that it wasn't murder in Magnitsky case.
Given that you assume Floyd was murdered, that means there are even more reasons for UK to sanction police department in US harbouring killers.
- - - Updated - - -
Where do you see oligarchs in the list above? Did you even read it?
"Officer", "Judge", "head of <various law enforcement departments>" - those are not typical oligarch positions.
Last edited by Shalcker; 2020-07-09 at 07:32 AM.
I don't know how many times it needs to be repeated: if the people in charge of providing the evidence are the very same people who are being investigated, the 'trial' doesn't mean anything. This isn't a difficult concept. Repeating this nonsense about the EHCR, as if it actually matters, is a waste of everyone's time and only harms your argument. On display: shalcker once again shilling for a corrupt system.
You're saying it like EHCR isn't deciding cases like that all the time. Do you think that European Court of Human Rights is dealing with well-meaning and honest actors all the time? That they didn't decide against Russia in cases against very same police? That they didn't decide against Russia in this case?
The problem is, Browder's proof of Magnitsky's murder is shit. A lot of his "motives to kill him" is outright lie. His timeline isn't supported by facts. That's why it isn't murder. Magnistky would be much better for Russia alive; if anyone should have wanted him dead it was Browder.