*SCREECHING WHISTLE*
Flag on the play.
Mistaking land for people. Land doesn't vote. People do. Posting a geographical map to try and make a point about demographics is at the very least indirectly misleading.
Something like the pointilism map, where each vote is given a point and the density appears accordingly, gives a better idea of distribution, and especially, exactly how much of that space that typically gets colored in red is, in practice, just empty space;
To be clear, that's a
2016 map, so it's not for this election, but we haven't got finalized data yet so such graphics have yet to be produced. The underlying point is still screamingly relevant, though; Republicans like posting geographical county-based maps, because a map with a big county with a comparative handful of voters looks more influential than a densely populated urban county, leading to an image that leans much more favorably in their direction.
Rural voters make up something like 20% of Americans, at best. They're not some giant minority that control the fate of urban America.
And frankly, the Democrats
have created policies which would be better for rural Americans than the Republicans' offers. Rural Americans largely
don't care; they vote on unrelated factors. Like blind partisanship and ugly racism and misogyny.