We're just supposed to believe them when they say the problematic individuals have been replaced? Like that removes them and the company from any culpability? The allegation of shredding is serious but I'm not surprised if it's true, big companies like to move fast and loose with the law when it benefits them.
Shredding documents really makes me doubt their commitment to positive change. Makes everything they have done recently seem incredibly disingenuous.
I understand what your confusion is there, but it's still a civil suit. It's not a criminal suit. A civil suit just means that it's a lawsuit alleging violations of civil law by the defendant. That the state is the plaintiff doesn't change that. The end result here is that Activision Blizzard if they lose (they will) will be fined monetarily.
I mean personally I've enjoyed a lot of Hearthstone content, WoW Classic, TBC Classic, parts of WoD, Legion, parts of BFA, D3's expansion / necromancer. I enjoyed Heroes of the Storm, and some of the StarCraft content. I enjoyed the D2R beta recently immensely. So yes I still do have faith in Blizzard to make games worth playing. Do I think some of their design decisions are dumb? Absolutely. Do I think they're a bad company? No. I think, if I'm completely honest, that the Blizzard community is very similar to the LoL and CoD communities where there will be a lot of vitriol on social media regardless of what the company actually releases. They're far from perfect but I think in a lot of cases they deserve more credit than they get from their fans.
Last edited by RoKPaNda; 2021-08-25 at 08:09 PM.
AchaeaKoralin - Are you still out there? | Classic Priest
the state tacking on actual criminal behavior this far from the original complaint reeks of state sponsored extortion. im not saying blizz didnt do anything wrong, but this is all looking like the state trying to force them into settlement because the state doesnt want it to go to court. they dont have a good track record there, only with forcing settlemements.
- - - Updated - - -
i dont think blizz losing in court is a certainty. DFEH is better at forcing settlement than going to court.
if they were really committed to change, they'd be 100% open and transparent... not hiding evidence, and shredding papers
Be careful who you chat it up with here on these forums. If you are NOT for WoW and about WoW, people will report whatever you say and get you banned
Maybe the big evil of next expansion will be the HR department…
Really?
The Starcraft remake is literally just a higher resolution.
Diablo 1 remake wasnt done by Blizzard and neither was the Diablo 2 remake. Also all of these games are just remasters and not remakes. Dont forget the WC3 remaster, which was an absolute shitshow.
Hearthstone is a pay2win mobile game.
Heroes of the storm is dead.
Overwatch is midly entertaining for a few hours.
Legion was a mess at the start but it was pretty good at the end.
Starcraft 2 was alright. Probably personal taste but Wings of Liberty was the best out of the 3.
So the best Blizzard can do nowadays is mediocrity.
Nah, F'em already,
No it won't, as any lawsuit before: This lawsuit will take on years, years where they will still release games and still make tons of money. At best this will cost them around 1 Call of Duty-Release, and that is already far fetched. Yes, some heads will roll, but this will be done individually, not for the whole company. As said before: this is not a company that makes big losses.
Just look at the Car industry: they broke the law professionally, but you can't say that they are now ruined. Or what happen with companies that did actually kill people: did the tobacco-industry broke down? Nope. And this will not happen here too.
What might happen is that Activision now will take over Blizzard faster than before: they restructurate Blizzard to be completely under Activision, for worse or even more worse (nope, there is no better in this; blizzard downfall was thanks to the fusion by Activision thanks to Vivendi who wanted to package both gaming companies to sell them)
In worst case for Activision is that some other company might buy activision for a deal, but that's still pretty doubtful. But who knows: Microsoft nowadays buys a lot of companies: getting the whole Call of Duty Franchise both for Game Pass and Xbox Exclusive might be worth it after everything settled down.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh, and one thing: while this might go down the court for years, what will happen is that they will probably make a deal and that's all. They will get a fine and move on.
If you'd actually played D2R in the beta you'd know that a lot more effort was put into it than their other remasters. They've actually gotten better there.
Hearthstone is not pay to win. The most popular Hearthstone mode at the moment is completely free (Battlegrounds) and Classic doesn't require any monetary investment either. They did a great F2P overall earlier this year.
Heroes of the Storm esports is quite dead, but the game itself is still alive.
Overwatch wasn't for me but it was one of the more popular games. StarCraft2 I enjoyed but the esports portion of it did die off. Legion was WoW at it's best for me, I didn't really buy into the community complaints about Legendaries or grinding despite being in the subset of the playerbase that whined the loudest about those things. For me legion was peak WoW so far.
Blizzard has always churned out a lot of mediocre products, the different is that now they have competition. D3 would be the pinnacle of ARPG gameplay if it wasn't for PoE. Despite dozens of other ARPGs coming out since D3 and PoE those two dominate the market.
AchaeaKoralin - Are you still out there? | Classic Priest
I have also been keeping it very in front of my mind ATVI is still planning on fighting the lawsuit, despite the changes they're claiming to have made - most of which should have been done 2 years ago when these charges were initially made by the state - and that the lawsuit only exists because ATVI/Blizzard didn't make any of the changes/enough changes the state was demanding back then.
If you look past the salacious aspects of the suit, ATVI Blizzard really don't want to lose this case. ATVI/Blizzard is facing potential injunctive and declarative relief in the suit, and as an actual lawyer explained it to me, this means that the judge can declare officially that what Blizzard/ATVI is accused of doing exists, and then getting an injunction against the company that if they're found to have done any of what's been declared again moving forward, they can be hauled into court for contempt. Imagine having every hiring, firing and promotion being under a microscope by the state. One can understand why they'd fight against that, but it's hard to have sympathy for a corporate entity who allowed it's practices to become so bad that the state is seeking it. That's on top of the massive amount of money on the line, as the state is asking for people to be re-instated, paid money the court thinks is owed, and damages and fines. It makes me wonder why they don't try to settle this, and avoid the injunctive/declarative aspects of the trial...or maybe they tried, and the state said "Nope, you had your chance for that." Who knows?
I found the claim by Blizzard of "We've proven there is no pay disparity" to be quite amusing. Unless it's along the lines of "We pay everyone way less than they deserve and what the industry pays across the board."
how is forced diversity going to fix this?do minorities or women not abuse others?