Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ...
6
7
8
  1. #141
    Quote Originally Posted by Orange Joe View Post
    it's a yes or no question.
    Stop trolling.

    Check out background of that event if you're interested.
    https://link.springer.com/chapter/10...-349-24124-8_4
    Russia's involvement in the Czechoslovakian crisis of 1938 stemmed from two sources. Firstly, the USSR's commitment to collective resistance against Nazi aggression and expansionism - a policy which Litvinov had affirmed time and time again in public statements in 1936-7.1 Secondly, there was the Soviet-Czechoslovak mutual assistance treaty of 1935 under which the Soviet Union pledged military aid to Czechoslovakia in the event of an attack on that country by a third party. Soviet assistance was, however, conditional upon France, which also had a mutual assistance treaty with Czechoslovakia, simultaneously fulfilling its aid obligations - a clause inserted in the Soviet-Czechoslovak treaty of 1935 at the suggestion of Benesl , the Czech President.

    The story of the Soviet role in the events leading to the Munich 'betrayal' of Czechoslovakia in September 1938 is a simple one. From the beginning to the end of the crisis the Soviets campaigned for international resistance to Hitler's designs on Czechoslovakia, urged the Czechs to stand firm, made it crystal clear that they would fulfil their mutual assistance obligations, and agitated for France to do the same.

  2. #142
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    40,024
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Czechoslovakia, until Poland, UK and France went with appeasement.

    Could stop his advance right there if they would allow to defend it.
    If memory serves

    Quote Originally Posted by Rozz View Post
    We've gotten really far off track, let's stick to the specifics of this topic.
    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Stop trolling.

    Check out background of that event if you're interested.
    https://link.springer.com/chapter/10...-349-24124-8_4
    Russia's involvement in the Czechoslovakian crisis of 1938 stemmed from two sources. Firstly, the USSR's commitment to collective resistance against Nazi aggression and expansionism - a policy which Litvinov had affirmed time and time again in public statements in 1936-7.1 Secondly, there was the Soviet-Czechoslovak mutual assistance treaty of 1935 under which the Soviet Union pledged military aid to Czechoslovakia in the event of an attack on that country by a third party. Soviet assistance was, however, conditional upon France, which also had a mutual assistance treaty with Czechoslovakia, simultaneously fulfilling its aid obligations - a clause inserted in the Soviet-Czechoslovak treaty of 1935 at the suggestion of Benesl , the Czech President.

    The story of the Soviet role in the events leading to the Munich 'betrayal' of Czechoslovakia in September 1938 is a simple one. From the beginning to the end of the crisis the Soviets campaigned for international resistance to Hitler's designs on Czechoslovakia, urged the Czechs to stand firm, made it crystal clear that they would fulfil their mutual assistance obligations, and agitated for France to do the same.
    If memory serves

    Quote Originally Posted by Rozz View Post
    We've gotten really far off track, let's stick to the specifics of this topic.

  3. #143
    As I said before, you have deep issues if your whole national identity is built on "деды воевали" and a fallen empire. Using uniforms of a country gone 30 years ago just points to it.
    Official game is not a historical reenactment.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadoowpunk View Post
    Take that haters.
    IF IM STUPID, so is Donald Trump.

  4. #144
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    If memory serves
    - - - Updated - - -
    If memory serves
    "If"is an insanely disproportionate large word for the amount of letters it has.

  5. #145
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Maybe have some gratitude that you didn't have to?
    Are you asking for gratitude after just before having gone on murdering rampage out of lust for more land and people to serve as puppets? False flag attack of winter war called, followed by some more in continuation war.

    Nope. As you said post before: you reap what you sow.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jtbrig7390 View Post
    True, I was just bored and tired but you are correct.

    Last edited by Thwart; Today at 05:21 PM. Reason: Infracted for flaming
    Quote Originally Posted by epigramx View Post
    millennials were the kids of the 9/11 survivors.

  6. #146
    Note that this isn't just an isolated incident - but part of Putin's general plan to rewrite history to restore USSR to glory, and thus being an aggressor in WWII attacking Poland, Baltic States and Finland, and committing genocide doesn't fit that narrative.
    https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/25/opini...kov/index.html
    However, it is primarily for internal consumption - but people do support USSR in Russia (49% according to poll - which is a record number).

    The older cohorts are nostalgic for the USSR; the younger ones have developed an image of the Soviet Union as a fairytale country, a retro-utopia where everyone is equal, everyone is free, and a stern-but-just father figure rules.
    ...
    At the last traditional December hockey tournament in Moscow, the Russian team took to the ice wearing a Soviet team uniform, and the audience often waved the Soviet flag. Three decades after the Soviet flag was officially lowered, it still looms large in Russian life.
    The interesting part is that Putin manages the balancing act of both making people long for the USSR utopia, and also support the current regime that exhibits everything that was broken after USSR fell.

  7. #147
    Over 9000! Santti's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    9,117
    This is just sad and pathetic. Modern Russia in a nutshell, desperately clinging to past glory.

    I'm sure it will be different this time!
    Quote Originally Posted by SpaghettiMonk View Post
    And again, let’s presume equity in schools is achievable. Then why should a parent read to a child?

  8. #148
    Old God Milchshake's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Shitposter Burn Out
    Posts
    10,048
    I dont buy the 75th anniversary excuse. It's just propaganda trying to retcon the trolling attempt by a nationalistic government. Nothing says Cold War like some agitprop.

    The 1946 uniforms.


  9. #149
    Moderator Rozz's Avatar
    5+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    8,797
    As a final reminder, keep it to the topic. The original warning was to impede intentional and unintentional derailing, not invite more of it.
    Moderator of the General Off-Topic, Politics, Lore, and RP Forums
    "If you have any concerns, let me know via PM. I'll do my best to assist you."

  10. #150
    Quote Originally Posted by PfeffermintShake View Post
    I dont buy the 75th anniversary excuse. It's just propaganda trying to retcon the trolling attempt by a nationalistic government. Nothing says Cold War like some agitprop.

    The 1946 uniforms.
    Yup, although that was one of the teams competing in 1946, as they didn't compete internationally under the banner of USSR until the World Championship in 1954 it seems, and then with a different design:

    from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_I..._Championships

    Note that the background color in that photo is likely blue not red (as I first guessed), assuming this replica is accurate:

    https://jlbsportrarities.com/product...raphed-jersey/

    But it seems they wore these jerseys in the 1960s; so to remember that the hockey federation was started 75 years ago, and started competing internationally 66 years ago with white on blue design, they wore jerseys from about 55 years ago.
    Last edited by Forogil; 2021-12-27 at 08:36 PM.

  11. #151
    The Unstoppable Force PC2's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    California
    Posts
    21,877
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Have you looked into "End of History"? That was exactly a view you hold - that there is only one way into the future, liberal democracy.
    Fukuyama changed his mind though which means he probably never understood politics and socio-economics in the first place. The guy explicitly admits he's a pessimist regarding the future, tech, and human progress...
    It is seen as largely disproven today.
    How so? That doesn't even make sense because it's impossible to prove/disprove such concepts in political philosophy.
    In a countries where liberal systems are ossified, like US, people flirt with outright coups because liberal-democratic system doesn't produce what people need - for example, even though majority wants M4A US system can neither agree to implement it in some way nor convince population that existing system is "good enough".
    That's not corroborated by reality though. Also a particular kind of society doesn't have to produce everything people want, it just has to be better than all alternatives.
    Last edited by PC2; 2021-12-28 at 12:33 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •