"Man is his own star. His acts are his angels, good or ill, While his fatal shadows walk silently beside him."-Rhyme of the Primeval Paradine AFC 54
You know a community is bad when moderators lock a thread because "...this isnt the place to talk about it either seeing as it will get trolled..."
Yeah, it's all evil Blizzard's marketing team that forces players to pay for subscriptions to a product they don't like. Yep. Just marketing. There is zero responsibility on part of the person buying the subscription to decide whether it's worth it. I mean, did you see that mount? They had no choice!
I don't think so at all. It's simply a good business strategy. No matter the expansion's popularity or quality, Blizzard has players that quit within the first few months of the expansion. Of course they would offer incentives for those players to keep playing.
We'll have to agree to disagree then.They're not "boosting" anything. They're offering players another way to pay for their subscriptions. That's all this is.
Be careful who you chat it up with here on these forums. If you are NOT for WoW and about WoW, people will report whatever you say and get you banned
True. It is every persons responsibility to look after their money. Hence why I choose not to get the 12 month. SLs has broken my trust in Blizzard quite severely. I am ready to give them a chance to win me back with DF, but I am not going to blindly give them 12 month of sub money, because of some mount (I tend to only use a few of my collection anyway and prefer the ones I earned over the ones I bought).
If the patch cycle and content of DF is acceptable again I will consider it, but definatly not before the .1 patch is released. I really hope they get things going again, but I am not sure. DF is already cutting quite a few corners and that is never a good sign.
Tell me you've never been anywhere near a marketing department without telling me. I won't say "tell me you've never had a real job without telling me" because I'll probably get infracted, but the truth hurts.
Any long-term deal is a bet with the company that you'll get more entertainment out of the sale than you otherwise would. There's always a discount for buying your sub annually because the income is already guaranteed for Blizzard - they don't have to offer you a discount, but then the objectively correct play would always be to buy in the smallest increment possible, which is obviously not ideal for the company.
Not everything a company does is part of some evil plan. And no, making profit is not an evil plan. You should ask Ghostcrawler whether he would prefer 100% of players pay by the day or annually, see if your messiah of video gaming echoes your whack opinions.
Netflix doesn't offer a 1 year model because their service is too good to quit. Blizz knows they can get a few suckers who will quit playing after 20-30 hours.
To the people who DO play WoW all year, year after year, looks like Christmas came early for ya.
- - - Updated - - -
Lol I do work in marketing and no one tries 1 year subs because only no one would pay for something a year in advance. WoW demographic is perfect for Blizzards monitization strats. Pay $150+ upfront + $60+ for the box. So 200+ big boys for a mount. They then rationalize it by telling themselves they are saving money by spending $200 bucks. Beautiful.
Last edited by pacotaco; 2022-11-03 at 09:49 AM.
Sounds like they are pretty dumb for buying something they didn't know they were going to use.
- - - Updated - - -
I personally don't think these deals are aimed at those people. They are aimed at people that know they are going to be playing for the year.
MMO-Champ the place where calling out trolls get you into more trouble than trolling.
Btw let's not forget we are getting a rabbit mount as well
How is a mount considered a reward at this point in your life. Everyone on this thread is in their 30s. Can someone explain to me the joy of getting a mount when you have a countless list of unused ones? Add one more to the pile. Then what?