Originally Posted by
Jibjabb
To me Parker isnt as good as Rose, I dont even see it being remotely close. Rose is better in basically every facet of basketball than Parker is, the only thing I can give an edge to Parker is his scoring in the paint and he turns the ball over a little less. Rose is quicker, stronger, faster, better shooter, better passer, better defender, and more dominant than Parker is.
Anyways that wasnt even the point of what Im saying. My point is its a pet peeve of mine when its mentioned how a team won without X,Y,Z and then dont even mention that the other team also was missing important pieces. Nobody is saying Hinrich is as good as Duncan, I am however saying hes extremely important cause without Rose hes the only other PG on the team that knows how to run it. Nate Robinson is like a SG trapped in a midget's body. Plus he makes some of the dumbest plays you will ever see, its why teams dont want him. Skill is there, brains arent. So ya the Spurs won without some big pieces it just gets overlooked that the Bulls lost without their superstar and their best guy to run their offense in his absence. (Not really trying to aim this at you, its mostly a media related rant)
Bulls are 26-14 with Hinrich out there. 4-7 without him. Hes not a great player by any stretch, but he is very important when Rose is already not around.