AKA you probably already ran it and didnt wanna post it
Yup ryzen does great when the program can use it. Not sure why this one is so poor, i know it scales better than most MMO's but maybe this bench/game needs a ryzen patch too.
Your 1700x must be at stock, i got a 7846 CPU score with a 3.8ghz OC:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/20247887?
Last edited by Fascinate; 2017-06-04 at 02:21 AM.
I wish I could have afforded the 1080 Ti, but I had to settle for the 1080 for 1440p 144Hz instead. Maybe in 2 generations.
If you look at my post, cpu clock speed means very little in this benchmark but responds well to any amount of extra you can get out of your graphics card. My 6700k at stock 4.0/4.2 boost clock versus a 4.7 OC was only +205 score on the benchmark. A OC of +175 on the core and +500 on the memory of the graphics card gave +1036 score on the benchmark.
So, I'd say any CPU that is high 3.X GHz is going to perform similarly; but if you can eek out any amount of extra performance from your gpu, you are going to notice it far more. Remember, different cards even from the same manufacturer have different clock speeds depending on the model you get ... so if you have say an EVGA, you could have one of their many different series for each model (FTW, FTW2, SC, SC2, classified, etc) with different factory overclocks that could be some of this discrepency being seen between very similar systems/similar cards.
I was surprised my card was outperforming a 1070 when you hear they are essentially the same, and I'm on an ultrawide so that should make me look a bit worse as most people aren't running a 21:9 monitor, and with that taken into account, I feel I was comparable enough to a 1080. Doesn't stop me from wishing I had a 1080ti though for no other reason than I want it
But, overall, everyone looks like they can run the game decently, and most at max without issues
My PC Build 4790k @ 4.7 GHz @ 1.28v; 1080 @ +175 core, +500 memory
The reason i asked if you could run 3d mark is to see if or how much faster your 980 is than my 1060 (for the gpu only part), once we knew that number we could try and figure out why your score is so high in relation to the ryzen rigs in here with much faster GPU's.
You got 142xx and a guy with a 1800x and a 1080ti score 148xx. I know you like to think the reason for this is your ~600mhz faster cpu speed, but im telling you that doesnt come close to explaining these scores lol.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Benchmark
Tested on: 05/06/2017 05:31:36
Score: 18038
Average Frame Rate: 122.131
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 1.032 sec
Scene #2 2.273 sec
Scene #3 1.929 sec
Scene #4 2.650 sec
Scene #5 4.758 sec
Scene #6 1.141 sec
Total Loading Time 13.786 sec
DAT:s20170605053136.dat
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Disabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: Maximum
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
-Glare: Standard
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Disabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: Quality
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled
System
Windows 10 Pro (Registered Trademark) 64-разрядная (6.2, построение 9200) (14393.rs1_release_sec.170427-1353)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz
16332.090MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (VRAM 8119 MB)
R5 5600X | Thermalright Silver Arrow IB-E Extreme | MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk | 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3600/CL16 | MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X | Corsair RM650x | Cooler Master HAF X | Logitech G400s | DREVO Excalibur 84 | Kingston HyperX Cloud II | BenQ XL2411T + LG 24MK430H-B
lol you are such a troll (and an uninformed one at that).
Ryzen isnt as nearly as slow in single threaded apps as you would like to think it is, its on par or faster than haswell. The only difference between our CPU's is clockspeed, mine is 3.8ghz yours is 4.7ghz. Obviously that is going to make up some of the difference here, but looking at the numbers this simply does not add up.
Also, 1060 is on 980 level, 1070 is a much faster GPU (1070 is actually faster than a gtx titan/980ti).
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/...X_1060/11.html
If you were a nice guy you would set your 4790k to 3.8ghz and run the benchmark again, i guarantee you would still beat me by a large margin, because the benchmark is not playing nice with ryzen.
Last edited by Fascinate; 2017-06-04 at 10:42 PM.
R5 5600X | Thermalright Silver Arrow IB-E Extreme | MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk | 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3600/CL16 | MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X | Corsair RM650x | Cooler Master HAF X | Logitech G400s | DREVO Excalibur 84 | Kingston HyperX Cloud II | BenQ XL2411T + LG 24MK430H-B
Its not just my CPU, look at the guy a few pages back with a 1800x. That boosts to 4.1ghz out of the box, and vegas score was only slightly behind his with a GPU much much slower (gtx 980 vs gtx 1080ti).
I know this is the perfect scenario for intel fans to troll, but im telling you there is something goofy with this benchmark lol.
Also no, a 1060 is almost exactly as powerful as a gtx 980, 1060 beats a gtx 970 in nearly everything ive seen.
From the title in arstechnica review:
GTX 1060 is faster than GTX 980, for just a wee bit more cash than AMD's RX 480.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016...x-1060-review/
Last edited by Fascinate; 2017-06-04 at 10:50 PM.
R5 5600X | Thermalright Silver Arrow IB-E Extreme | MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk | 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3600/CL16 | MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X | Corsair RM650x | Cooler Master HAF X | Logitech G400s | DREVO Excalibur 84 | Kingston HyperX Cloud II | BenQ XL2411T + LG 24MK430H-B
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Benchmark
Tested on: 6/4/2017 6:50:50 PM
Score: 19653
Average Frame Rate: 139.167
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 5.407 sec
Scene #2 4.507 sec
Scene #3 4.219 sec
Scene #4 5.872 sec
Scene #5 10.571 sec
Scene #6 2.023 sec
Total Loading Time 32.602 sec
DAT:s20170604185050.dat
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Borderless Windowed
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Custom
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Enabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: Maximum
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
-Glare: Standard
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Disabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: Quality
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled
System
Windows 10 Home 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (14393.rs1_release_sec.170427-1353)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz
32681.953MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (VRAM 11158 MB)
This software does not guarantee that your system will run the Windows versions of FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn, FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward, and FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/pr/
(C) 2010-2017 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.
Share Results
Type 1
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 19653 1920x1080 Custom DX11 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Type 2
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 19653 1920x1080 Custom DirectX11 Borderless Windowed NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Type 3
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Custom DirectX11 Score: 19653 Extremely High
Type 4
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Custom DirectX11 Borderless Windowed Score: 19653
Full Results
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Benchmark
Score: 19653 Extremely High
1920x1080 Custom DirectX11 Borderless Windowed
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV
lmao look at that, a 6700k with a 1080ti scores 19653, and the ryzen systems scores 14,8xx with same GPU.
Ya, obviously that is ALL down to ryzen, good joke guys
- - - Updated - - -
Eh no, 1060 is on par or faster than a 980. Please look closer at these scores, ryzen being ~600mhz slower (remember ryzen is on par or slightly faster than haswell in IPC) is not making up for the score differences in this benchmark.
R5 5600X | Thermalright Silver Arrow IB-E Extreme | MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk | 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3600/CL16 | MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X | Corsair RM650x | Cooler Master HAF X | Logitech G400s | DREVO Excalibur 84 | Kingston HyperX Cloud II | BenQ XL2411T + LG 24MK430H-B
lol proof. if thats the case why does my amd system smoke my 2500k machine in overwatch and other games?
Obviously ryzen is going to be somewhat slower in older games like this, its just funny to me you guys dont see the problem with the scores in this particular benchmark. There is nearly a 5000 point difference between one guy with a ryzen 1800x and another guy with a 6700k (same GPU 1080ti), and you will actually believe that is completely down to the CPU and not an issue with the benchmark lol
One way to settle this for certain is if vegas 82 set his 4790k to 3.8ghz and reran the benchmark. That fully levels the playing field on the CPU side of things, and my 1060 is on par with a 980 in terms of GPU power. I bet you any amount of money his system would still score much higher, that would point to a problem with how the benchmark is recognizing ryzen CPU's. Notice how i said recognizing not utilizing, because core count would be irrelevant if he set his cpu to 3.8ghz, that is core per core parity.
Edit: As an aside, why are you guys with 1080ti's running 1080p monitors? O.o
Last edited by Fascinate; 2017-06-04 at 11:17 PM.
This benchmark hammers the CPU more than Heavennsward. That said @Fascinate, your score isn't that far off from this benchmark. It's using a 7700k. There's more likelihood the higher powered GPU may incur a penalty but I wouldn't really know without more data with usage.
Do note, if they have vsync or other type of stuff on in the graphics (not benchmark) control panel, it will hugely affect score. It was the case in HW benchmark, no doubt it will be a problem here.
http://www.4gamer.net/games/360/G036007/20170505001/
http://www.4gamer.net/specials/4g_be...gulation.shtml their test set up, all software stuff.