View Poll Results: WoD or Legion hunter better?

Voters
385. You may not vote on this poll
  • WoD

    292 75.84%
  • Legion

    93 24.16%
Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ...
6
7
8
9
LastLast
  1. #141
    Banned A dot Ham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    America, you great unfinished symphony.
    Posts
    6,165
    Quote Originally Posted by Banard View Post
    Change flanking strike to some double glaive strike attack name with animation (does same damage)
    Change the name of mongoose bite to some glaive/fel sounding name.
    Change raptor strike to some glaive/fel sounding name.
    Change lacerate ...well maybe not really a reason to change that name,
    Change explosive trap to some fel aoe with dot.
    change fury of the eagle to some glaive whirlwind type name.
    change carve to some glaive/fel sounding name.
    Change harpoon to some JUMP on target and smash ..wait DH have this now?
    Change disengage to...wait DH have this now !?

    going to stop now, but get the point? Same gameplay as surv, plays different then the DPS demon hunter and its own theme! Hunter's didnt need a melee spec. We didnt need 2 extra melee dps and lose 1 range dps spec in legion.
    While I actually like the idea of a DH with a polearm, and a fel version of the current SV spec. Some of the champions wield polearms.

    I don't think scrapping it from hunters is the right idea. Perhaps the happy medium is that hunters got a 4th spec. One that didn't bastardize an existing and popular spec.

  2. #142
    The obvious first change for Survival hunter would be to combine Raptor Strike and Lacerate into one spell.

    There is really no reason to have basically 4 polearm strikes (Mongoose Bite, Raptor Strike, Lacerate and Flanking Strike) plus the Artifact Ability.

    Raptor Strike should simply apply Lacerate.

  3. #143
    Quote Originally Posted by A dot Ham View Post
    Perhaps the happy medium is that hunters got a 4th spec..
    There is no happy medium, it is a pure *(^(&^ show. Melee hunter was a meme from the past. It was not needed in the game.

  4. #144
    Banned A dot Ham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    America, you great unfinished symphony.
    Posts
    6,165
    Quote Originally Posted by Banard View Post
    There is no happy medium, it is a pure *(^(&^ show. Melee hunter was a meme from the past. It was not needed in the game.
    So says you. Remind us again why your opinion matters?

  5. #145
    Mechagnome Nihal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Somewhere Far Far Away
    Posts
    575
    WoD MM hunter with 4 set from HFC

  6. #146
    WoD had interesting specs with just the right balance of components and a nice varied 'best' spec with every tier. Legion launched with one fun but deeply flawed spec (marksman) and two complete duds and hasn't got much better since.

  7. #147
    Stood in the Fire Nairesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    352
    I chose WoD as well, but MoP was still best. Especially Survival was great.
    Blizzard will change stuff again "soon", when this raid tier is basically over and the gap tot he next Xpac happens.
    I'm dreading it already.

  8. #148
    Would hav to say wod cause they had their three specs not just two

  9. #149
    Survival is cancer to play. BM does shit tier damage compared to like...almost every other dps spec in the game. And MM is rng and lacks mobility, a core theme to hunters for how many years?

    I prefer WoD hunters.
    Prot Warrior 2004-2008 Hunter 2008-????

  10. #150
    where's the MoP option....

  11. #151
    I personally enjoy survival; however, the other two specs have been in an absolutely disgraceful state this entire expansion. Marksman is so far removed from any class fantasy or rotation that existed before Legion that it is almost unrecognizable. Therefore my answer is WoD...(though bring me back to the ICC days).

  12. #152
    Quote Originally Posted by A dot Ham View Post
    So says you. Remind us again why your opinion matters?
    Because we didn't need an additional melee, yes it's just opinion but most agree with that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •