Morris led with his shoulder, Jokic led with his shoulder. But Jokic's hit was harder and from behind. Anyone suggesting otherwise is simply ignoring the truth. The video speaks for itself. Jokic saw it coming and was staggered a few steps. He then ran up and laid out Morris from behind.
Lol. There's no argument. The word legitimately has specific meaning when it comes to hits in sports.
It literally originated as a football term for being hit from the side in which you're not looking. Blindsiding a player is outlawed in many sports because it exacerbates the potential for serious injury.
The term has been co-opted outside of sports in a
figurative sense to generally mean "caught unaware", though it's often debased to simply "caught by surprise", which is not the same thing. Jokic saw Morris coming and knew that there was going to be contact. He expected a take foul, but received an unwarranted hard foul by Morris. That foul was definitely an FF2 and Morris was properly ejected for it.
But Jokic took a running start and blindsided Morris in return. Morally, I don't have a problem with it, because Morris sure as hell provoked it. But from the league's standpoint, it was still a blindside and that's too dangerous to allow.
Whatever you want to tell yourself. The tape doesn't lie.
- - - Updated - - -
That moment where you realize that the Cavs, led by... uh...
Kevin Love?...
Ricky Rubio?...
Collin Sexton have a better record than the Lakers led by LeBron, AD,
and Westbrook and
nine(?!?) players taking a veteran minimum contract this year.
Also, remember when the Cavs offered Kevin Love that $120m 4-year contract extension and everyone thought it was a
really good deal for the Cavs to lock down that top-tier talent?
No, neither do I.