Originally Posted by
Theodarzna
Text of post:
A joke of a post that nobody could take seriously, except i guess an AnCap grasping at some major straw.
Already cited that, and i bunked it, but yeah, me musing it would be funny if Trump got his daughter to run as the first VP and the intersectionals reaction would be eye opening. Kind of like the #MeToo Feminists becoming ardent rape apologists to defend Biden.
Me correct pointing out Hillary isn't doing so well politically and isn't likely to win, not an endorsement of Trump. But I guess citing a NYT's piece is Trumpian in AnCapistan?
Pointing out the polling data is Trump endorsement now? By the way all this stuff reminds me of how I was right and vindicated on Election day. Also, what should I have done? Like not mentioned it? Like if you just don't acknowledge that she was a bad candidate, she becomes a good candidate through magic. Is/Was Hillary Clinton a Tulpa, or a Chaos God whose material nature depended on what we thought about her? So if we all thought she was sunshine incarnate she would have become that? If so I apologize sincerely for screwing up the ritual.
Asking if Hillary can be trusted on her position on the TTP/TTIP is saying "Vote for Trump" how?
Pointing out the Hillary is failing with young voters is an endorsement of Trump? Also she was doing better with the kids than Biden, so I guess Biden is double fucked now.
I've never been pro-Intersectionality and pointed out that the logic of "Coalition of the Ascendant" depends on a very Alt-Righty kind of Demographics are Destiny thinking is both horrible but also not likely to ever happen isn't an endorsement of Trump.
Talking about the email server scandal, notice I never say "Vote for Trump"? I'm really bored here with this, I'm hoping somewhere you've got something. Is this some big brained "If you are not praising Hillary you are for Trump" kinda thinking? Magical.
A star slate codex post (A dude who isn't a Trump supporter) going over the actual humans who voted for Trump and trying to accurately represent them. OMG, Could there be any worse form of Fascism? /s
Seriously, this is your big smoking gun? I humanized some people instead of dehumanized them by treating them fairly?
Not an endorsement of Trump, also I criticize correctly the whole Mueller bugaboo that later turned out to be bogus. Man you bringing up my greatest hits, its like a recollection of how the real MMO-OC GenOT saying should be "Theo is always right".
Lol, I never even mention Trump in that post, seriously, Machismo? Who is your dealer? I clearly am smoking the wrong stuff. Also I criticize both parties in that one. I point out that both parties aren't friendly towards the poor in their rhetoric and outlook.
I, Theo, Correctly point out, via citing BuzzFeed (Not exactly a Trumpian news outlet) that a lot of Democrats fell for a hoax in their deep and earnest desire to OWN THE DRUMPF, were increasingly zanny and willing to believe just about anything making them way too easy to troll and make out to be fools because they could and would believe any bait place in front of them they think will lead to them "OWNING THE CHUDS!"
This reminds me in a microcosm kind of way about how there was this poster named "Miss Koboyashi" whom unbeknownst to me; a ton of posters here earnestly believed and talked to as me. They even called this poster Theo. Theo-Trutherism was big, and I found out only when another poster finally tagged me and I got to have a laugh riot at this and rightly point out how it was nonsense. Sometimes people grow to hate someone so much, they make that person like a totem and out to be more than they are, AND more accurately in this case, are willing to believe anything about that person.
Here, it is pointed out that a hoax managed to deceive a lot of well meaning but blinded by their anger over losing an election. I warned against going for stuff that was too good to be true. Heck I've done that, we all fall for things that sound like they are true because they represent "Those enemies" so perfectly. Heck look at the Jussie Smollet incident or the Covington Catholic High School kids incident, people WANTED to believe those stories, but once proven to be hoaxes they made the people who instantly believed it look bad.
Lol, I cite a MATT STOLLER piece and that is support for Trump? Dude pointed out that a lot of the generic average Democrats with their "Love trumps Hate" schtick are hypocrites and acting like this is toxic and that is saying "Vote for Trump?"
I don't believe the RussiaGhazi, yeah, that also isn't me saying "Vote for Trump" or "I endorse the presidency of Donald J. Trump". Also man, it feels good being vindicated later on about RussiaGhazi, it literally led nowhere and produced nothing except talking points used by Centrist democrats against Leftists. In the end all that shit even helped Trump politically and become a weapon for corporate democrats to maintain their control over that party.
I, correctly, point out that for Democrats to start winning elections they have to first even be willing to admit to defeat in the first place. Which in the thick paranoid frenzy of "It was all a Russian plot!" hysteria it is impossible to even broker the thoughts and ideas that "Maybe we didn't campaign good". Also I never mention voting for Trump here either.
I correctly and factually cite that the DNC lawyers state they were under no obligation to even run an impartial or fair primary isn't some big endorsement of Trump either. I think so far the pattern of why I get flamed so much is I say things a bunch of people don't want to hear, I don't say a lot of comforting things and people get freaking ANGRY about that.
I cite Eric R. Weinstein; so far the only vaguely "Right" link other than the NYPost you got me on and even Eric R. Weinstein didn't vote for Trump nor does he advise one do so, but he does correctly point out the media uses interesting vocabulary for their descriptions of his actions, lexicon not used with past presidents, even past presidents who did similar or even the same things.
Lol, I don't even mention Trump here, and merely point out that with Tom Perez as chair, the DNC is sticking with the Clintonite consensus. This doesn't even mention Trump.
I cite Glenn Greenwald (Not exactly your Trumpian source) and question if cozying up, valorizing and lionizing CIA, FBI and other deep state apparatchiks is a good thing and rightly point out the immorality of say wanting a coup d'etat to overturn the 2016 election. That isn't really an endorsement of Trump. I mean its an opposition to state power and saying "Hey guys, hating Trump is fine, giving the CIA a loving kiss on the trouser snake in hopes that big daddy covert agents overthrow the election is probably a bad way to handle this" is not exactly a Pro-Trump sentiment.
Welp, Brendan O’Neill; hey, finally I am citing someone legitimately disgusting... a Libertarian. Yuck. I will repent for that for sure. But his point, and mine, which is valid, is that Trump is not uniquely evil or awful given the broad scope of history and horrible things American Presidents have done.
I freely admit to have a cold frozen heart of black ice, yes, I made fun of someone setting themselves on fire to protest an election, not even a military coup, but just an election between two flavors of center-right to more right. Yeah, I am a cunt, but didn't say "Vote for Trump. However, re-reading that, some of my puns were legit funny and I am smiling once again. That first page is goldmine of morbid puns.
So to recap your quick copy pasta of randomly selected old threads:
I have some conservative social/cultural opinions; oddly none of those threads you even cited, Sad. Even at that its not even that Right-Wing of views. I have Marxist views on economics. I basically can summarize all these threads in one little package.
Basically; like a mom who thinks her fourteen year old daughter going on a date with a twenty five year old man with a "No RAGRATS!" Tattoo on his chest and a backwards baseball cap whose name is Kyle, and rightly points out all the mistakes this course of action will take, you are the insane person saying I must hate my daughter for not wanting her to blow that man ten years older than her or for daring to suggest its a bad idea. And when she comes back, single, knocked up and on drugs, you are the person suggesting I'm not supportive enough for rightly pointing out that her course of action was partly how she ended up here and she needs to be better than this. Basically I point out that Democrats are making a lot of mistakes, and critique Neo-Liberalism and call on Leftists to act better and that is a great and terrible sin. I've done the same for Conservatism when it comes to Free-Market Fundamentalism or militarism and zionism, but alas those threads don't get much attention here.
The key insight and skill I have politically is that I've spent the last four years mostly ignoring Donald Trump. In my view he is the least important thing right now. For people for whom Donald Trump has been the sole single thing that occupies their entire mental space for the last four years this must be genuinely aggravating.
Dude, I really hope you have actual evidence, but so far this trip down memory lane is kinda fun; though sad that you are taking the time for this or not even doing that good of a search.
- - - Updated - - -
Sorry, but only Marianne Williamson, Crystal Queen is good now. Alas Tulsi endorsed Biden.