It does not matter, the idea is simple - to reduce the damage done when a person who is sick sneezes. It's literally a case of blocking 0% of the spray and letting it rip all over the place or a good amount of spray already even with a simple cloth mask.
I'm not sure why you lot need to be so edgy about it. It's not all or nothing situation. Even a simple cloth mask is already blocking a lot of shit you sneeze out and even better if you use surgical mask, which is really not short in supply and was designed exactly for that.
Last edited by Gaidax; 2020-04-02 at 07:08 PM.
You are given dime a dozen of clarifications, it's 2020 - use bloody google and common sense.
You are given all the reasons in this thread already, so why play dumb? Yes, simple cloth masks even scarves and definitely surgical masks are good practice for everyone to use exactly for that one reason alone - if you are sick and unaware you reduce the amount of said particles you release significantly this way. In this situation every bit you can do helps, so just do it.
It's really that simple.
It doesn't change the outcome of the data. This continues to be a bizarre gripe.
Not only that, but considering how quickly it ripped through Italy and how long (2 months) it took to reach 100 cases in the US, acquiescing to your complaint would skew the US even lower.
Last edited by Dacien; 2020-04-02 at 07:18 PM.
Even more antibodies found, with a potential vaccine on the horizon. Trials will require a year though.
https://wjactv.com/news/local/upmc-u...vid-19-vaccine
I appreciate you are trying to post good news in a quite depressing thread, but still you need to look at what you are posting. You are incorrect in saying the data wont change. By changing both axes to a per captia (or both to outright if you wish), what you will do is translate the US curve somewhat. So instead of it rising underneath the other two , it now rises to the left and therefore possibly higher. I'd have to run the number to see where exactly it would move to.
Problem here is, do we have any choice? Lockdowns don't work, social distancing doesn't, these 2 only slow the virus.
Second problem here is the vaccine, we won't have any for the next 6 months, and when it comes out, the demand for it will be so hight and the production so low (around 100 000 a day) that most people in the world won't get any vaccine in the next 3-4 years.
Also, most med's currently under sars-cov2 testing, will take at least another 2-3 month's to finish tests, and once we finally discover one that works, their production will be controlled by 2-3 countries in the world, and we will have the same exact problem as in the vaccine.
I don't like it, the problem here is that i can't do a shit against this systhem. And no, there won't be 70 million people dying from coronavirus, you foirgetting that easely 25% of cases are assimptomatic.
I have have shifted from being a lockdown supporter (and i still support most of this systhem) to being someone that supports her imunity, i just don't support all people to be infected at the same time, so lockdowns must keep being a thing.
Most epidimiologists already support the herd imunity idea, because they know its spreading too fast, and that there won't be any med's for it, or when those med come out, there won't be enought to treat all of the ill people.
It's about being correct, nothing else.
To account for the difference in per capita rates, the US should be compared with a starting point of 550 cases, not 100, since the US is 5.5x the population of Italy.
That amounts to a leftward shift of 6 days (100 cases on 3/2 vs. 541 cases on 3/8).
A 6-day shift puts the US currently almost exactly in the same spot as Italy was at our point in the curve. We'd still be below Spain's curve, however.
EDIT: Honestly, Spain's data should be shifted one day to the right, also, as they're smaller than Italy.
Last edited by PhaelixWW; 2020-04-02 at 07:31 PM.
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils