Digging up the past to justify actions in the present is the current M.O. all over the place. Not surprised it's done in this case as well.
Digging up the past to justify actions in the present is the current M.O. all over the place. Not surprised it's done in this case as well.
Error 404 - Signature not found
So, you just enjoy holding something someone did a long time ago over their heads indefinitely? You dont believe in being reformed or redeemed? If someone commited a robbery over 30 years ago but hasnt done anything since, he deserves to die?
Sounds like you're fine with police brutality to me when its convienent for you.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Yeah, how about this guy? What are your opinions about him?
See Image: Who is Derek M. Chauvin?
https://ibw21.org/commentary/earl-of...erek-m-chauvin
RIP Genn Greymane, Permabanned on 8.22.18
Your name will carry on through generations, and will never be forgotten.
You don't have to. But you should still be outraged by the racist, extrajudicial murder of that man that took place over 9 minutes.
Nobody is asking you to like the guy, dude. Just understand that you could be that guy one day, and you'd better hope you haven't done anythign bad in your life at any point so that tolerant folks like yourself can come out and say how you deserved to be murdered by the police.
Again, why are you holding a regular citizen to a higher standard than cops? Because it seems to be like you're falling for the coppaganda here and implying the cop didnt do anything worng because Floyd "had a decade old criminal record" and doing a whole lot of pearl clutching.
Imagine being able to keep a straight face spinning a fictional account of white victimhood wherein white citizens are not the historical perpetrators of--inclusive though not exhaustive--mauling, shooting, looting, lynching, bombing and burning down businesses and churches with little girls inside, chaining black men to the back of trucks and dragging them to their deaths, and then holding those armed white people up as aspirational model-citizens for not killing anyone while protesting the discomfort of being asked to stay indoors during a pandemic.
Last edited by Levelfive; 2020-06-02 at 04:59 PM.
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. --Frank Wilhoit
Ultimately irrelevant. In the aftermath, you have the benefit of all this knowledge. You get to pick apart this man's life and decide he deserved to die (which is a ridiculous stance, but we'll move past that for the sake of argument). The cop who killed him did not. In the moment, he decided to take this man's life because...why?
{MMO-Champion General Rules} {Off-Topic Forum Rules} {Video Games Discussion Forum Rules}
"I would let Anduin ravish me." - aiko