True it's why I think the system although flawed works best when platforms are kept open. I don't find handing over the reigns of the most useful and effective means of spreading information should be in the hands of those owning a monopoly on the platforms. This goes doubly true with how third party sites offering a more liberal platform have their means of doing business pulled from them by most creditors crippling them from doing transactions.
I won't ever really understand this desire to attack free speech and pretending its different because a corporation is doing it instead of a political entity.