Page 1 of 17
1
2
3
11
... LastLast
  1. #1

    You guys and your Log links...Lol

    Bashiok just tweeted that Warlock seems very reasonable to him and he used these logs, er link to prove it.....

    https://www.warcraftlogs.com/statistics/6/

  2. #2
    High Overlord Shiennar's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Garrison
    Posts
    126
    Time to bring out the popcorn.

  3. #3
    Deleted
    Many lines, handle eeet!

  4. #4
    The Patient Nykko's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Near the fictional town of Nowhere, Kansas.
    Posts
    313
    I... I don't get what you're trying to say?

  5. #5
    https://twitter.com/Bashiok/status/546808586559442944 This is what he's trying to say. Still our best spec is 8th out of 11 on that specific percentile, the rest are worse.
    Last edited by Tramzh; 2014-12-22 at 01:52 AM.

  6. #6
    Epic! Volibear's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Climbing in yo' windows
    Posts
    1,696
    So what, the median performance isn't a good judge of performance?

    Even at the 90th percentile, they're mid-pack. https://www.warcraftlogs.com/statistics/6/#dataset=90
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester Joe View Post
    Brolibear!
    Quote Originally Posted by RICH816 View Post
    Ladies know and love his caaaaaause! It is the Panda with the Chainsaw claaaaaws!

  7. #7
    Whats wrong with mid pack?

  8. #8
    High Overlord Psidum's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    183
    Can't wait for Extremity's 100,000 word essay reply.

  9. #9
    High Overlord Shiennar's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Garrison
    Posts
    126
    Quote Originally Posted by dean771 View Post
    Whats wrong with mid pack?
    Why bring midpack, when you can bring top-pack?

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Psidum View Post
    Can't wait for Extremity's 100,000 word essay reply.
    Hilarious. Well done sir.
    Quote Originally Posted by xskarma View Post
    Next time before making a thread try to at least have a reasonable discussion topic and not use this forum to rant about simple matters.

  11. #11
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Shienna View Post
    Why bring midpack, when you can bring top-pack?
    someone has to be midpack.

  12. #12
    Epic! Volibear's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Climbing in yo' windows
    Posts
    1,696
    Quote Originally Posted by Shienna View Post
    Why bring midpack, when you can bring top-pack?
    Why stack top-pack dps if you're not going for WF? It's irrelevant.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester Joe View Post
    Brolibear!
    Quote Originally Posted by RICH816 View Post
    Ladies know and love his caaaaaause! It is the Panda with the Chainsaw claaaaaws!

  13. #13
    I play a lock and the dps is fine, we have to work at it though, harder than we had to.

    We are not nearly as versatile a dps class we lost some raid utility and really don't bring much which other classes don't do and in some ways better.

    We are coming out of SOO where we dominated everything, its hard to be mediocre after being so strong. But being mediocre is fine if you have a raid spot now, but finding one is more difficult. We aren't used to having to work as hard or being passed over for mages or hunters.

  14. #14
    Stood in the Fire
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    437
    Quote Originally Posted by rerecros View Post
    someone has to be midpack.
    Seriously, I don't get why people don't understand this. Even in a near perfectly balanced world there will always be specs on top and others, on bottom.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Volibear View Post
    Why stack top-pack dps if you're not going for WF? It's irrelevant.
    Well to be fair here even in a "lower tier" guild having the worst possible setup can be frustrating. That said there still seems to be a decent number of parses up on warcraftlogs at least.

  16. #16
    Deleted
    whats your point? Warlocks are mid pack which means there dps is fine. Stop complaining, you were OP for an entire expansion, you can be mid pack for a tier. jesus christ.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Steak View Post
    whats your point? Warlocks are mid pack which means there dps is fine. Stop complaining, you were OP for an entire expansion, you can be mid pack for a tier. jesus christ.
    I didn't know being 8th out of 11 classes was middle of the pack
    I didn't know being 10th out of 11 classes was middle of the pack

    Maybe you guys should Google how to find averages.

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Shienna View Post
    Why bring midpack, when you can bring top-pack?
    cause you arent going to bring 5 arms wars, 5 dps dk's, 5monk dps's to a raid?
    theres 2 range spec's above you. whats the issue?

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Volibear View Post
    So what, the median performance isn't a good judge of performance?

    Even at the 90th percentile, they're mid-pack. https://www.warcraftlogs.com/statistics/6/#dataset=90
    10th out of 11 classes
    Demonology 15th out of 24
    Destruction 16th out of 24
    Affliction 19th out of 24

    Please tell me how "middle of the pack" they are with your lack of grade school math.

  20. #20
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Steak View Post
    whats your point? Warlocks are mid pack which means there dps is fine. Stop complaining, you were OP for an entire expansion, you can be mid pack for a tier. jesus christ.
    hmm, if locks were op for an entire xpac then i think you only count SoO, locks were strong in the begining but far from OP, it wasnt until Soo that they became OP but then again, why screw over a class of players bcoz the devs screwed up?

    either way, locks still need some balancing, i find it funny that he thinks is fine to be 6th, 9th and 15th (9th, 15th and 18th best if you will) last out of 24 dps specs, by that account our specs would still need a 5-15% buff to keep up with the other top specs or they would need a 5-15% nerf to be brought down to us but im not the kind of person to ask for nerfs for other classes, im not that petty and tbh i doubt we'll see any buffs/nerfs any time soon.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •