Check me out....Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing, Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing.
My Gaming PC: MSI Trident 3 - i7-10700F - RTX 4060 8GB - 32GB DDR4 - 1TB M.2SSD
False.
True!
No, you interpret it as anger because I don't simply swallow anything handed to me while you seek to use deflection(which is typical forum argument). I don't need to pat your back and buy you unicorn puppy sunshine milkshakes in order to express my discontent at a pile of rubbish and my view isn't diminished by you attempting to look like 'the better man'.
Don't be offended that people don't accept your views as their own or that you even work there just b/c you remind people of it every other time you post. We already think for ourselves which is the entire point. Please don't try and spin the blame off on to a company for selling to EA...that's just laughable.
Does it make them right for selling out for money? No. Are they the ones who are doing the actions referenced throughout the articles about this subject? Nope...that's EA, 'doing what they do' like you so aptly stated.
BAD WOLF
I guess that makes your views propaganda as well then, being one sided and all.
Your reading into me far too much, i don't do it to look like 'the better man', i do it because i hate arguing with people over the internet. I prefer to do it in person that way nothing is misinterpreted. I tend to lurk more then get involved these days for that exact reason as i'm not typically forum savvy.
Agreed but when people state that such and such developer is dead/destroyed by EA and provide no information based on that causes me to ask. I tend to do my own research and not rely on what one source has told me. A new trait that i'm starting to abide by at least.
ps. I don't remind people every other post either, i think I've mentioned it twice. If i could take it back i would too.
Last edited by Toccs; 2013-04-10 at 04:13 PM.
sorry for the flood, but i think this is related, those two journalists talk about the "poll"
Well, EA took it seriously enough to make a whimpering failure of an "apology"
Forbes wrote excellent article on the subject of this Consumerist thing:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertco...america-again/
Last edited by Wilian; 2013-04-10 at 07:36 PM.
Modern gaming apologist: I once tasted diarrhea so shit is fine.
"People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an excercise of power, are barbarians" - George Lucas 1988
That article is a really nice read. Especially:
Except the last paragraphs: I hope the author doesn't really expect anything to be changed.Is it deserved? No. If we’re being honest, it’s not. There are dozens of companies that are technically, legitimately, actually worse than EA in terms of how much harm they directly cause people, and many of them are on this list. Rather, Consumerist’s poll doesn’t gauge this. Instead, it’s a measure of how annoyed the internet is with a certain brand at the moment.
In german we got a saying: Ist der Ruf erst ruiniert, lebt es sich ganz ungeniert. Means: When your public opinion is ruined, you can do what you want and let yourself go. It doesn't really change anything. And as long as micro management on full price games and forced drm increase profit, no matter how hated they are for that, it will continue. Profit is more important than the customer, like in every other business.
they are thing i don't like and other i don't really care.
always online: i don't like at all, because of the murphy's law: if something can go wrong, it will go wrong. Either my internet, or the game server, or the login server, or wnything, at one point or another, i will not be able to play when i want. Something is bound to go wrong, so no to always online
Pushing game too early I don't like, i prefer game release when they are done, well polished and quality. i don't think this is a good business practice anyway, it always always come back to bite you in the ass.
Micro transaction like in dead space 3 for ammo, crafting mats etc... whatever, i don't care, i'm ok with it. If people are stupid enough (sorry for the name calling, but it's warranted) to ruin their gaming experience buying a quick way to finish the game, their problem not mine, i never used microtransation in the past, and i don't plan to, so does not affect me.
content DLC well for starter everyone does it, deus EXHR (the missing link), dishonored (dunwall city trials, knife of dunwall) call of duty (map pack) skyrim (dawnguard, dragonborn) Everybody does it. I apply the same reasoning for them than for any stand alone game. Is it good value for the money. If yes, i buy, otherwise, i don't, simple as that
Streamlining franchise so it appeal to a wider public audiance. Everyone does it; blizzard (wow), ubisoft (splinter cell conviction), 2k (xcom). that's a game design and not necessarely a bad thing, depends how it done. besides, i'm not convince it is so much an EA decision as a develoepr decision (or evena common decision)
pre order bonuses no problem with it
origin client no problem with seems robust client
rarely goes on sale that's their policy, i don't have a problem with it. i always ask myself is it good value for the money.
some game not on steam i don't care as long as they are on origin, i can purchase online
closing down unproductive studio well, i guess it depends. Always sad to see legendary studio like bullfrog, westwood, sierra go under, but quite frankly, if they were releasing succesful game, EA wouldn't close them, so it's partly their fault. EA could support them i suppose, but to an extend. man i would love a reboot of the theme hospital franchise.
can't think of other thing for now
I wonder is apple apologizing to china customers had anything to do with this?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21996134
Time...line? Time isn't made out of lines. It is made out of circles. That is why clocks are round. ~ Caboose
One of the founders of Bioware discusses his relationship with EA, key quote :- Zeschuk wouldn't change a thing about his time at BioWare or EA, which he says "gives you enough rope to hang yourself"
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/article...console-future
Less worthless words and better products and service would be nice.
"Privilege is invisible to those who have it."
Check me out....Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing, Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing.
My Gaming PC: MSI Trident 3 - i7-10700F - RTX 4060 8GB - 32GB DDR4 - 1TB M.2SSD
In all honesty I find it hard to believe that people consider a video game company worse than a bank or a retailer.
A bank is by far the worst considering recent history by default. EA should not have made it as far as it did in the contest regardless of how bad they are. Worst gaming company for sure. Worst company in the US out of the contenders? Hell no. Worst company in the US outside of the contenders? EA looks like a saint in front of most US corporations.
And it's obvious EA is not going to change until people stop buying their products. Voting them to be the worst company only shows that 1. a lot of us have effed up priorities and 2. that we apparently still care about the company enough to deal with their shit when buying their video games.
Last edited by Flaks; 2013-04-11 at 04:59 AM.
Originally Posted by High Overlord Saurfangi7-6700 @2.8GHz | Nvidia GTX 960M | 16GB DDR4-2400MHz | 1 TB Toshiba SSD| Dell XPS 15
Last edited by SirRobin; 2013-04-11 at 06:32 AM.
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
It's THE CONSUMERIST. That evaluation is based on company-client relations, in which EA fairly beats anyone in how poor they treat theirs.
For crying out loud, when did Bank of America started to call their clients "fans of BoA" and when they started to call complains of "feeling of entitlement"?
Probably only Wal-mart used the vocal minority lie to defend itself between the contenders, besides EA.
And their "apology" is a reminder they are greater and more powerful than any "fan".
In client-company relations EA deserved the 2 prizes by far, and IF they can reach 2014 without "going THQ" they will win a third time.
EA is by far the most crappy video game companie there is, for real , pay 50 bucks for the game, pay 15 dollars for the other half or some crap like that. Meh i hate EA.