Originally Posted by
Fleugen
Posting before the shitstorm moves over here:
No, Demon Hunters bring nothing unique to the game and is probably not the next class.
1) Overlap with Warlocks - Contrary to what you think, "Ranged Magic Damage Dealer" and "Melee Damage Dealer" are not polar opposites; They're quite similar. Especially when one is a "Ranged Demonic Magic Damage Dealer" and the other is a "Melee Demonic Magic Damage Dealer."
Hand Warlocks a melee spec, and what do you get?
2) Glyph of Demon Hunting - You're right in that it's going away with WoD. However, in MoP it was also confirmed that Warlocks learned their Metamorphosis form from the alpha-Demon Hunter, Illidan. Metamorphosis is still a Demonology Warlock spell, and that is not changing anytime soon as it's so heavily built into the spec that removing it would quite literally break the spec.
Warlocks learned a spell from the alpha-Demon Hunter, proving the above point that Demon Hunters and Warlocks share a significant magic theme.
3) Ability Pruning? Really? - This doesn't help your argument at all. The Ability Pruning does not in any way, shape, or form remove the design space that Warlocks fill that overlaps with the Demon Hunter design space.
4) Popularity does not introduce classes - Demon Hunter has been the MOST popular class idea since BC WoW, yet we still do not see it in game. Less popular ideas, such as Death Knight and Monk were introduced first. Why would popularity in any way, shape, or form decide the next new class?
In other words: All of your points are moot. You have no leg to stand on. And I will be leaving this thread before it devolves into another argument.