So, are forsaken alliance now?
So, are forsaken alliance now?
Why would the Forsaken want a leader with nearly nothing in common with them?
She didn't get "scourged", she has never been Horde, she didn't try to help them for what must be close to 2 decades now, and she was never hunted as a monster by her former kin.
The forsaken have real leaders they could have turned to if Blizzard had bothered to build them up (see : the development it looks like they might squander on Nathanos).
They do not deserve some light-bound puppet that has done precisely nothing to help them for decades.
Looks like Blizzard already forgot that Voss joined the Forsaken only in Legion after deliberately not being a part of them for years. Also, I like how they dragged Gey'arah out of all people into this mess. I guess no Horde leader is free from the unification vibes.Overlord Geya'rah: And you? Where do your loyalties lie?
Lilian Voss:Where they always have--with the Forsaken.
God forbid it actually happened in an organic matter or something rather than being an instantaneous 180 shift. As long as you get to go on about how mature you are about being OK with change, amirite?
Well if this doesn't make it sounds like unification....
Yay, finally Lordaeron gets its rightful queen back. Oh man the Apothecaries better run, Calia got guns!
I mean there is acting dense and then there is this. I mean hell dude I'd ask you if you've ever played this game or ever paid attention to any forsaken lore with how hilarious your statement was.
Please elaborate in detail, or try to elaborate at all how Calia is a good leader for the Forsaken.
The ONLY thing she has is she is human, and if race is all in your eyes that's needed to make a good leader, it's no wonder you are so easily satisfied with the upcoming new leadership.
- - - Updated - - -
You know she's going to poke a blight cannister and go "what is this?"
And an Apothecary is going to say "uh, liquid friendship?"
calia will then clap her hands, or maybe she'll do everyone a favor and drink it.
At least Sylvanas had been with them every step of the way. Hell, she freed or raised the vast majority of them.
Sure, she was selfishly using them, but why they followed her made sense.
A light-blessed, alabaster statue that until recently was merely a lore footnote, and has never done a single thing for them or been with them serving as their leader does not make sense.
Any forsaken player character has a better claim to leadership than their absentee "Queen".
Last edited by Villager720; 2019-10-08 at 01:01 AM.
The only thing in common Sylvanas had with The Forsaken of Lordaeron was they were both killed by Arthas. What does it matter the circumstance of one's death? They're all undead just the same. Calia meanwhile, grew up with presumably most of these Forsaken, she knows them by names, and can offer them comfort of her family name, Arthas notwithstanding, but Terenas who presumably is still considered a beloved king, versus the Undead elf that just spit on them and abandoned them.