That's an outrageously dishonest argument. First, the fetus isn't a person, and all your arguments otherwise mean nothing. Second, even if it were, nobody's infringing on the fetus' bodily autonomy.
That's the inevitable consequence of your argument. If right to life of Person A can be construed to supercede the right to bodily autonomy of Person B, that's what justifies forcing organ donations. If that upsets you, engage in some self-reflection because it's your argument.And stop with that weak organ donation argument. I already explained why it's senseless, whether u agree or not is up to u.
In short words so we're clear. I get what you're saying. It's just unreasonable and demonstrates that you're lying to us when you say you think the fetus is a person. Because you're okay, apparently, with killing a child of rape, by your own argument. So now we have to decide; do you think you could freely kill a 12 year old because they're the product of rape? Or were you just lying the whole time you claimed you considered the fetus to be a human being, a person? It's one of the two. Feel free to pick.What part of rape is an EXTREME do you not get?
It's not that we don't understand you. We do. That's how we know you're lying.
And? Ignoring the castle doctrine nonsense, killing in self defense is not "murder". And pretty much nobody argues that killing is always "wrong". The base principle is not violated by the existence of self defense considerations.Murder is bad plain and simple but you can bet if someone comes Into my home that I'ma make a rug out of them.
There's really no other explanation. You don't believe in fetal personhood, and even if you did that's not even an argument against abortion rights, so what else is there?You can keep screeching I hate women, man you do you. But it is what it is, and rvw is only the beginning, mark my words.