Agreed. I could see initial concern of "Hey there are two guys in combat fatigues walking around carrying rifles", that might be understandable concern. After being told it's ROTC though, then say okay, apologize if needed (likely not needed) and then drop it and don't cause trouble afterwards.
I'm going to move the moment my country allows civilians to carry guns in public, you create situations where law enforcement is scared of it's own people which leads to more incidents as any person has an increased risk of pulling a gun.
There is a reason cops are more likely to jump to their guns in the US.
Americans are so reactive to these situations, an entire train in the UK get's halted and searched if someone's My Little Pony backpack has been left unattended because it's a "Mysterious package" but I don't care because I didn't get blown up.
Let's wait for someone who could or could not be gun weilding maniac posing as apart of the ROTC, don't report it though, fuck america
I'm sorry but I honestly don't believe this teacher who isn't new to the school and was warned by the school previously:
Honestly didn't know what was going on. According to the school site she has been at the school since 2010 it would seem based on the awards section, so yes it seems fairly doubtful that she thought a terrorist attack was going on.“We did send an email notifying all students, faculty and staff that ROTC would be holding exercises throughout the spring in the Quad portion of campus. But we recognize that the notification wasn’t sufficient,”
It's a funny time in our history.
The police are indeed jumpy and sometimes for good reason and sometimes simply because of fear/gut reaction.
http://kfor.com/2014/02/20/family-po...answered-door/
In the 1940s and 50s ROTC students were actually allowed to fire live ammo indoors at school during target practice.
Now the country is so divided. Some of the people want everyone to own guns no matter who they are, or what crimes they've committed, all under the guise of "freedom". Now we're wanting to kick out/monitor everyone from one religion to keep ourselves safe.
Then you have people freaking out over unlocking a Iphone of known terrorists when it could lead to real information.
Everyone wants to have their cake and eat it too.
People either;
- Want the government to not infringe on a single right and think they can somehow defend themselves against terrorist threats.
-They're okay with the government infringing upon rights to stop terrorism as long as it's none of their rights.
-Then there's those who are willing to have certain "rights" limited or monitored in this period when terrorism is rampant.
Our country hasn't and probably won't decide what the best method is until long after its too late.
Last edited by -Nurot; 2016-03-24 at 02:32 PM.
"Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.” - General James Mattis
When I was in ROTC, ours had the barrels filled completely to the point where a round couldn't be chambered, and none of the moving parts actually moved to prevent them from screwing up drills.
Hell, in the late 90's and early 2000's we had a shooting club still. Our indoor range was for air rifles only, but we'd go on field trips to shooting ranges.
The guns aren't real. We have a good number of colleges and Universities that have the ROTC program. There's also a number of military colleges, but that particular University is not one.
Unless you've lived in a small town your entire life in the US, you're bound to see something similar in nature fairly frequently.
--- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.
Thanks for the explanation. I did not know about this ROTC program, we have nothing of the sorts here (at least that I know of). Yes I should probably have read all the thread before replying instead of just the first page but the article itself was not specific about the nature of the weapons. In that case it does seem to me to be a bit of overreaction by a "anti gun" person.
http://www.grandforksherald.com/opin...sed-und-campus
Professor's own words,
So she is knowingly admitting she's going to call 911 under false pretenses.He also tells me that ROTC will be doing these exercises for the next couple weeks.
So I reply that I guess I'll be calling 911 for the next couple weeks—and I will. Every time.
--- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.
Because by wearing their uniform and putting a gun on your back (any kind) still gets you more attention and scrutiny than just putting the gun in a bag, dressing like every other student on campus? How many shootings have been done on school campuses by people in uniform carrying a "rifle" around... By your logic, we should ban baggy pants, poofy coats, and book bags, they are more scary to me because they typically hide guns/bombs/knives/anything of bad intent.