Page 6 of 95 FirstFirst ...
4
5
6
7
8
16
56
... LastLast
  1. #101
    pretty sure the people that are complaining wont even play the game

  2. #102
    Quote Originally Posted by 7empest View Post
    Please make the men less muscular too, I feel uncomfortable
    Can we make porn dicks less huge too? xD

  3. #103
    Really dumb move from Blizz. Not only is that pose not sexual but the complaint against it is basically a complaint about basic human anatomy. We live in a world where women walk around all day in yoga pants and you're really worried about your 'child' (that's bullshit, btw, they are just puritans using 'think of the children' as a cover) seeing a fictional woman's backside? All they've done is opened the door for more complaining about nonsense because people will think they can change anything that mildly 'offends' them.

  4. #104
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Protar View Post
    I don't really see the pose as a big problem, but nor is it a big deal that it's getting removed. Like Blizzard said the day they announced OW that their goal was to be progressive and to sexualise their female characters less. So if they actually replace this and we get a badass pose instead of a sexy pose then to me that's great.
    That's mutually incompatible with each other.

  5. #105
    Elemental Lord Lady Dragonheart's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Amongst the Wilds, or in my Garrison... >.>
    Posts
    8,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Xilurm View Post
    That outfit your character wears on your sig. You can expect that you won't be able to wear anything that revealing in any future Blizzard game. Fucking hell. These people are disgusting.
    So? I don't play because of the outfit that I wear. No reason to rage about it.
    I am both the Lady of Dusk, Vheliana Nightwing & Dark Priestess of Lust, Loreleî Legace!
    ~~ ~~
    <3 ~ I am also the ever-enticing leader of <The Coven of Dusk Desires> on Moon Guard!

  6. #106
    Quote Originally Posted by Pengalor View Post
    Really dumb move from Blizz. Not only is that pose not sexual but the complaint against it is basically a complaint about basic human anatomy. We live in a world where women walk around all day in yoga pants and you're really worried about your 'child' (that's bullshit, btw, they are just puritans using 'think of the children' as a cover) seeing a fictional woman's backside?
    But you don't get it. It's just an opinion, and because it's an opinion, it doesn't need to possess any objective value. Therefore it's a valid complaint. Therefore attacking the logic behind the complaint is silly.

    [/sarc]

  7. #107
    I find my character being super built offensive and not in tune with the majority of men! FIX IT BLIZZARD FIX IT FUCKING NOW.

  8. #108
    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonheart Maiden View Post
    It's their marketing concepts. In all seriousness, the best way to show your disdain is to not play the game and have a spine about your own ideals.
    I won't. Heck I used to love Blizzard games. Lately they turned all SJW and it shows. The only game I'm even remotely interested in is WoW and that's because I've been with it's lore since 2005. Just want to see it to its end. But even that is proving a challenge.

  9. #109
    Quote Originally Posted by Xilurm View Post
    I won't. Heck I used to love Blizzard games. Lately they turned all SJW and it shows. The only game I'm even remotely interested in is WoW and that's because I've been with it's lore since 2005. Just want to see it to its end. But even that is proving a challenge.
    They've already stuck there, sylvanas was offending the land whales.

  10. #110
    The Unstoppable Force Arrashi's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Land of human potential (and non-toxic masculinity)
    Posts
    23,003
    Roadhog and junkrat both show too much skin - please censor them blizz or i will get triggered.

  11. #111
    I'm surprised this person didn't bitch about Widowmaker, honestly.

  12. #112
    Deleted
    The men have to much muscles, it scares me. censor it nao

  13. #113
    Quote Originally Posted by Arrashi View Post
    Roadhog and junkrat both show too much skin - please censor them blizz or i will get triggered.
    Yeah! Blizzard is obviously trying to glorify obesity and mental illness, this is harmful for the children! That makes me really uncomfortable!

  14. #114
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by GoblinP View Post
    That's mutually incompatible with each other.
    Look I know you're whole spiel about how if you don't like sexy video game characters you're being prudish and anti-progressive. But the point is that sexiness should not be the default for female characters. Some characters should be sexy, some should be non-sexualised and some should be at various points in between. And OW is already doing pretty good at that by the way. This is just one tiny tweak.

    Like don't get me wrong I love sexy video game characters. Give me sexy male characters, sexy female characters, sexy trans*/pan/intersex/genderfluid/attack helicopter whatever characters. But they should also be more than that and Blizzard is clearly trying to make it so that sexy is not the default character type for their female characters.

  15. #115
    Quote Originally Posted by Arrashi View Post
    Roadhog and junkrat both show too much skin - please censor them blizz or i will get triggered.
    Omg Reinhardt too is showing way way too much skin. Change this plz or I will get so triggered.

  16. #116
    I think this video speaks my piece on the whole subject.


  17. #117
    Elemental Lord Lady Dragonheart's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Amongst the Wilds, or in my Garrison... >.>
    Posts
    8,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Xilurm View Post
    I won't. Heck I used to love Blizzard games. Lately they turned all SJW and it shows. The only game I'm even remotely interested in is WoW and that's because I've been with it's lore since 2005. Just want to see it to its end. But even that is proving a challenge.
    If that's the case, why do you even care anymore? You should quit following the game instead of apparently punishing yourself to try and like it... It's like complaining that you're a masochist by that point. If you really don't like it, don't force yourself to remain tied to it and move on. It is, literally, the best way to prove your points on the matter.

    As for me, I don't really care about the direction because I don't play the game for sexual/sexualized reasons. I like them, but they aren't directly required to RP in the manners that I do. So, I'll continue playing, funding, and supporting Blizzard as I do. Little things like this, they seriously aren't worth the time to worry about.
    I am both the Lady of Dusk, Vheliana Nightwing & Dark Priestess of Lust, Loreleî Legace!
    ~~ ~~
    <3 ~ I am also the ever-enticing leader of <The Coven of Dusk Desires> on Moon Guard!

  18. #118
    Deleted
    loving the tears from GGers and "muh videogame" extremist. I'm not agreeing with the practice, but nobody in this thread would scream if it happened on a male hero.

  19. #119
    Bring back the butt pose!

  20. #120
    Quote Originally Posted by Protar View Post
    Look I know you're whole spiel about how if you don't like sexy video game characters you're being prudish and anti-progressive. But the point is that sexiness should not be the default for female characters. Some characters should be sexy, some should be non-sexualised and some should be at various points in between. And OW is already doing pretty good at that by the way. This is just one tiny tweak.
    No it's not. What the fuck are you talking about? You don't have to choose this pose. FFS.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •