Originally Posted by
guardian_titan
What Blizzard stated this time they stated in the past, but honestly Blizzard had no obligation to respond to the petition. Petitions were only meant for the government, not businesses. People throw around petitions like they throw around lawsuits. They're overused and their purpose quickly forgotten.
There's a few things with this, though:
1.) Petitions rarely verify who signs it so how do we now all of those 235k signatures were different people? What if 50 of them were signed by the same person? What if 50k were a bot? What if 10 were from the same family? Unless they had every person send in a copy of their ID and they verified that across every signature, petitions are worthless. Due to people gaming the system, a petition of 50 unique people would get brushed under the rug for a petition with 200k but 190k were made by bots. How many of those signers even have ever played WoW? Were they just bribed to sign? Did they just sign the petition randomly? Petitions are often worthless pieces of (digital) paper that scream "look at me!" They're just cries for attention.
2.) More players have played WoW and quit than are currently playing. Of those 235k, how many are currently playing? How many only played in vanilla and quit? How many never played in vanilla? How many never played WoW at all and had their signatures bought? How many are fake?
3.) Private servers are free. Many accept donations but that's about it. Few would willingly pay a subscription to a private server if they don't even donate on a regular basis.
4.) Blizzard didn't shut down the server. They CLAIMED Blizzard did to cover their own rears. They shut it down because they weren't getting enough donations to cover the cost of running the server. They actually stopped taking donations a month before it shut down. So that shows the users on the private servers were too cheap to even maintain the server themselves. You think there will be enough playing on an official server to support it? With 235k signatures, if each one donated a single dollar, the server could have been run for the next several years, and yet the players were too cheap to do so. How many really played on the server? 10k? 100k? If there were 100k and they all donated a dollar, same thing. The servers could have ran for a few years. That only shows there's only interest in vanilla servers if they're free and someone else foots the bill. These people don't think about the cost of running those servers.
5.) I don't get why people even want legacy servers. People whine when Blizzard fails to release a patch every 2-4 months. You really think people will be happier than clams playing on a server that will never get updated? People would whine that they're paying for nothing without considering that their money is going toward maintenance. People whine now wondering where their money's going most of the time, especially during content droughts like now.
6.) Even if Blizzard did a vanilla server, what patch would they do? The first patch? The AQ patch? The Naxx patch? The TBC pre-patch? Can't please everyone with what patch they pick. Then there's also the PvE, PvP, RP, and RP-PvP situation. They might have enough players to support one server. How would they cater to all 4 crowds without alienating players who might have liked to play on a vanilla server without having multiple servers?
Blizzard can't win. As soon as they relent and do a vanilla server, people will want a TBC one, then a WotLK one, etc. Where would they draw the line?