The difference is it is "their month", they have a support group, they are considered a minority, they were already considered the "victim" and most importantly the have celebrities backing them up. The children id not have all this. They were everyday Americans. Hollywood will take it up as a "worthy cause". Even Democrats and liberals will talk about this during the election.
I'm unsure if you're trying to defend Obama, at which point I'd say "when has he ever called it radical [insert religion here]"?
If you think Hillary wouldn't have said that if she was president, that's an even bigger reason not to vote for her, no? At least Trump is consistent.
People will definitely rally around children much more easily than they'd rally around gays.
There's thousands out there who are decrying this but conveniently forgetting that there's gay blood on their hands too.
Well that and democrats really blew their wad with the 94-2004 assault weapons ban. It was a total embarrassment for the left and not enough time has passed for people to forget. Maybe in another 50 years.
- - - Updated - - -
Wait what? Did tennisballs get perma banned from gen-OT? haha
The point which you missed, is that mass stabbings don't have as many dead. As it's easier to stop a knife wielding nut job than a gun wielding not job, and obviously the killer if he has enough ammo and a weapon with a good rate of fire can fire off a lot more shots. While stabbing someone requires you to chase them down and stab them. Thats the point I was trying to make.
Let's be very clear. This cock-sucker had flags galore. Several reports from co-workers about radical Islamic propaganda. Reports from coworkers that he was blatantly racist and homophobic. Reports that he was bi-polar. Reports that he beat his wife. Reports of violent angry outbursts. He was friends with an American that traveled to the Middle East to be a suicide bomber. Three FBI investigations.
And yet with all these flags, he was able to legally purchase firearms just a few days before the attack.
Yeah. We definitely need a much more comprehensive background check system for firearm purchases.
Eat yo vegetables
ill agree to an extent, but the idea of restriction (that has been suggested by political figures) is not realistically going to fix the problem. it in essence takes guns away from good folks. im all about keeping guns away from people that shouldnt have them, but there has to be a good way of doing it without taking away from good people
I'm sure they also only ever said "AR 15 style" whatever that means.
But lets not forget that you can transform a AR 15 into an almost full auto. You cannot buy it that way, but the how to guides can be found in seconds.
For correctness, the rifle is not yet properly described by officials. Everything remains speculative.
One report last night said, he ran into an off duty cop outside the venue, after gunning that guy down, he essentially forced his way into the building firing at everything that moved rapidly. Not sure whether that's how it happened. I believe CNN had that version reported.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
"One of the Caliphate's soldiers in America carried out a security invasion where he was able to enter a crusader gathering at a nightclub for homosexuals in Orlando, Florida ... where he killed and injured more than a hundred of them before he was killed."
-- ISIS
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
Actually it might, there are a few too many examples of higher restrictions reducing gun violence. However there is also the odd argument of Switzerland.... people say they have tons of guns and low violence. It ignores that you kinda need to be in the military. Israel is also pretty strict, although due to the whole situation they are basically an outlier.
Trump is consistent, but consistent wrong about it.
And do I defend Obama? You can say that. I defend the President, and his unique position of responsibility.
It comes with the position, it comes with the responsibility of that position that the President must always be politically correct. Without any exception.
Diplomatic fallout must be avoided, at all times.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."