The movie is a flop because Universal focused the marketing on its fan-base and the fans didn´t show up for the movie.
They'll release it to theaters. While it is a definitive flop in the US, it made enough internationally (mostly in China) that they will potentially greenlight a sequel again. Foreign markets love US schlocky CGI / action flicks...in this case far more than usual (89.4% of the money is from foreign markets...the highest I've ever seen for a US movie; usually it is 70% to 80% from foreign markets no matter how good/bad).
Keep in mind that Universal didn't make tons of money off of this. They only get 1/2 of the money from the movie ticket sales, so $412 million translates into $206 million. Subtract out the $160 million budget and typically $5 to $10 million in advertising (that is usually outside the published budgets), and they only made $35 to $40 million. Considering how horribly bad it did in the US (plummeted to number 11 this weekend), the DVD sales probably won't pull in much either.
That means that a sequel isn't guaranteed despite the optimism of Duncan Jones. If a sequel is greenlit, expect it to be tilted more towards Chinese expectations where they know an audience is located.
they should have focused on the lore instead of turning it into a capeshit action movie. why the fuck start from the beginning but not even show how gul'dan came in contact with the burning legion and learned of fel magic? because as usual, blizzard underestimated it's audience. alien-demons would have been too complicated to throw in the mix. and what was up with all the tacky plastic gems glued to all the armor and set pieces? king llane's crown looked like plastic!
i think we can finally confirm that duncan jones is a poor director. moon and source code only did well because jake gyllenhaal and sam rockwell are good actors that can get by with a bad director.
Last edited by Cute Chen; 2016-06-27 at 05:06 AM.
Unless someone finds out the marketing budget we don't know whether it's in the red or not. Here's what we do know:
Warcraft:
Production budget - $160m
International gross - at least $412m
Pacific Rim:
Production budget - $180m
International gross - $411m
So it's already more successful than Pacific Rim in those terms (ie ignoring marketing budget which we don't know for either film).
They're kind of similar really, both are heavy CGI films without big name lead actors (and frankly both have... uneven acting let's say), both made most of their money outside the US, both are aimed at a nerdy market with a fanservicey mindset, both were poorly marketed domestically (allegedly)...
Well it's been asserted.
Nobody in this thread knows whether this movie will turn a profit or not, unless you're going to tell me you work for Legendary's accounting department.
This was already aimed at fans with no-name actors :P
Slashed budget... maybe. Seems like the budget all went into the CGI anyway. We'll have to wait and see.
- - - Updated - - -
Because the movie is a straight adaptation of Warcraft 1 and that stuff didn't happen until much later retcons.
More realistically, they didn't want to crowd an already complicated plot.
- - - Updated - - -
I'm really hoping for a big director's cut. Apparently there was a lot of cut material.
I don't know what to make of speculation like that, what do films do differently to "pander" to Chinese audiences? Allegedly The Dark Knight had the Hong Kong heist scene for that reason, and supposedly parts of the last Bayformers movie were set in China for the same reason. I have no idea if this kind of thing even works.
Michael Bay's shitty movies were the same garbage before and after they discovered the power of the Chinese market.
Early estimates were never 350 mil regardless if the pre-sales were crazy.It was one more week in cHina and it will bring around a total of 235-240(currently 223)
Thats a huge load of money.
Irt had fantatic performances in RUssia(22 mil)-Germany -France-Spain. and a total of 80 mil in eUrope al is fantastic.
But 43 million in fucking USA? 43? With a total estimation of 47? THis is discusting, even if the general audience refused to watch the movie i just cannot accept the fact turned their back SO much in the movie.
You could be right but I am not so sure, time will tell.
As far as I can tell it is yet to make any money for the companies behind it and even it has broken even having $160+million tied up for the best part of two years without an appreciable return is not great. Simply put it would have been better in terms of risk and return for Legendary/Universal to have left the money in a low interest bank account.
With regard to DVD sales I do not think it is a stretch to suggest that there is potentially a large market of players who would buy multiple copies; theatrical version, extended version, director's cut, etc and this could be boosted even further by in game give-aways such as pets, mounts, transmog.
So the movie will just make a little over break even. Sequels tend not to do as well as the first. China will probably have to find 10 times more flooded theatres to sell tickets for.
- - - Updated - - -
Someone should go count how many times this kind of asinine post has been said.
- - - Updated - - -
Nah, we're just smart enough to avoid shit movies.
- - - Updated - - -
It will release in china and the rest of the world will get it straight to dvd.
That's exactly the problem though. As someone who knows all the lore surrounding Warcraft and what great movies could be made out of that - THATS why you should go see it alone. Warcraft isn't the best movie ever, far from it. It has its flaws but it also has its moments.
By "avoiding" this now, you may potentially make the execs at Legendary turn their back on the franchise. I for one would love to see more of the cinematic Warcraft universe - and I am not a big fan of the first movie.
Yes, it's such a dubious assertion that marketing budgets are nonzero, and that theaters don't show movies for free.
/rollseyes
- - - Updated - - -
It could also follow this strategy, as described by The Onion.
"There is a pervasive myth that making content hard will induce players to rise to the occasion. We find the opposite. " -- Ghostcrawler
"The bit about hardcore players not always caring about the long term interests of the game is spot on." -- Ghostcrawler
"Do you want a game with no casuals so about 500 players?"
Yes, it is.
The movie has not only broken even but made a profit higher than what they predicted by a large, large margin and secures the right for sequels to be made. I didn't particularly enjoy the movie, just bringing some facts to the table when there's a lot of uneducated and straight up wrong information being spread.