About as soon as people start championing the cause that we shouldn't be able to stop two people from loving each other, and that our beliefs shouldn't be able to stop two people from getting married. After all, #LoveWins.
Wait...
“Humanism means that the man is the measure of all things...But it is not only that man must start from himself in the area of knowledge and learning, but any value system must come arbitrarily from man himself by arbitrary choice.” - Francis A. Schaeffer
how about this. incest is now legal but any retarded/mutant kids that are born from it must be killed. so we wont have any wrong turn/the hills have eyes hillbillys inbreeds/monsters.
of course some people might think u've been watching game of thrones too much wanting incest to be legal and all..
Stop watching so much incest porn on the internet.
It's pronounced "Dur-av-ian."
It's also apparently quite popular, based on that Pornhub ranking of most popular channel categories.
I know my post sounds flippant but really, I see no upsides to legalization of incest, it is in fact legal in some states/countries (not many however).
Also I seriously think that this question was asked because of porn reasons.
Because you can't legally ban repoduction in the US separate from the act of sex, there is no precedent for it.
Also it is my personal belief that it will have numerous adverse effects on child-rearing, blurred boundaries between parent and minor child, etc.
Also it's fucking gross. We don't need to legalize everything, sone shit can stay taboo.
I'd say incest. It seems to be huge in porn, so I'm betting kids are gonna want to try it soon (as part of a larger "sexual liberation" movement).
- - - Updated - - -
Don't have to keep it illegal for it to be taboo. Being gross is just your subjective opinion, just like gay sex might be gross to someone.
Exactly. There's no possible way that this won't be exploitative on some level, even if the two wait until the age of 18 to start a relationship.
Children should not be viewed as sexual objects/ future romantic partners by their parents.
This thread is so distasteful that I think this will be my last commentary on the subject.
But isn't that all your opinion? Shouldn't those 'opinions' be entirely and completely disregarded as long as those other people 'feel' like its love?
Uh oh, you said the P word in a thread that has vague ties to the discussion of sexuality and its legal context. I recommend going into infraction protection services.
“Humanism means that the man is the measure of all things...But it is not only that man must start from himself in the area of knowledge and learning, but any value system must come arbitrarily from man himself by arbitrary choice.” - Francis A. Schaeffer
incest will never become legal as any offspring will result in deformities/abominations.
And anyone who thinks that game of thrones is pushing some sort of incestuous agenda to get laws changed is kidding themselves.
Hi
So incest will never be legal because the children that are a result will have deformities? So why again is drinking while pregnant still legal, since it would also cause problems with the child? It's their body, their choice, isn't it? The baby isn't a person until born apparently, its a part of the woman's body or something! So even if incest would cause deformities, isn't it still her body, her choice?
“Humanism means that the man is the measure of all things...But it is not only that man must start from himself in the area of knowledge and learning, but any value system must come arbitrarily from man himself by arbitrary choice.” - Francis A. Schaeffer
"I was a normal baby for 30 seconds, then ninjas stole my mamma" - Deadpool
"so what do we do?" "well jack, you stand there and say 'gee rocket raccoon I'm so glad you brought that Unfeasibly large cannon with you..' and i go like this BRAKKA BRAKKA BRAKKA" - Rocket Raccoon
FC: 3437-3046-3552
Because abortion is killing a form of human life while 2 people having sex hurts no one.
And human life starts at conception. When the fetus can live outside the womb it's... viable, I guess.
- - - Updated - - -
That's not true. I don't know much about genetics, but it simply isn't.
You are right in that Mokoshne is wrong. There is "only" a higher chance for the child to have genetic diseases.
I don't mind homosexual siblings who have sex with each other as they don't harm anyone. In case of heterosexual couples, it's different as there is potentially another life involved in this. Even though it's just a higher chance for the child to get a severe disease, they are also banning male homosexuals from donating blood because of the higher HIV risk.
I think if people were responsible they could have sex as much as they want. If I knew about a sibling couple I'd think it would be gross but I wouldn't judge them if, say, the man is sterilized.