Is it that you don't like when your own sources are used against you? When your sources literally say:
Others doubt the pattern’s very existence. “There’s still a fair bit of controversy about whether there’s even something there that needs to be explained,” says WMAP scientist Gary Hinshaw of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.
10/10 bait, guaranteed replies on here.Just another attempt from science to write off a creator
There is also none that state that it ISN'T. The CMB is just one of the reasons i lean towards us being created, the fact that if you put the earth in the center with our current understanding of the cosmos and newtons laws still work.....well that tells me something (remember, newton never said the small revolves around the large, he said that the total mass revolved around a center)
How am i a troll exactly? What is my agenda here? I am only showing what i believe to be truths of the universe, and trying my best to show why i believe so.
This is much less interresting when you learn that Hubble have found more than 2000 of these since we sent it up there, or at least planets in the goldylock zone. They are not really very rare. About 50% of stares have at least one planet in that range.
This is a false argument, you could make the same claim of any other point on that axis and in fact ignores any point not on the axis, so does not even cover the entire universe.
I said there was no evidence of a creator and arbitrarily pointing out the Earth does not challenge that claim.
No dude, i am saying with our current view of the universe relativity states there is no point that is special and there is no way to tell one from the other. That means inherently you cannot tell me without question that the earth isnt in the center, because you cannot prove it with any test.
If god existed it must have been pretty hammered. The Earth is at an angle, hasn't god heard of a spirit-level