Fair enough. I figured there was a small chance that is what you were referring to but you didnt actually quote Trump, at least not in a way that made it clear you were doing so. In his case I think it actually was 6 million. And yes, it was because he was the son of a very wealthy who loaned it to him, so what. So your point was that eople with money shouldnt be able to decide who to give/loan it to o what to spend it on? Ostensibly you have an equal chance to receive and education and to try and achieve your goals. Others also have the choice of whether or not they want to help you. The person you you quoted is still correct. You have the ability to try and go to UPenn, to try and make a shit load of real estate. Others are more successful and came from less that Trump. You are pointing out that Trumps outcome is different though.
Yes, no starting points are identical. People from more successful familys who get better educations and have stronger gene pools have an advsntsge, but that is a caricature of the point. If everyone is provided with the tools to help themselves, then the goal has been accomplished.
- - - Updated - - -
"Should" and "are" are not the same thing. Also evasion is illegal because it means you will not pay taxes on earned income. Deferring is not illegal though because you will pay tax at a future date when you take possession of the income.
Do I think they all can? No, but they do, so I'm not really embarrassing anything.
Also those incomes are completely arbitrary. 100k and lives where? What school does the kid go to? how smart is the kid?
If you think that going to a good school is about being in the right high school and not about being smart, you are wrong. I was in the right high school and I knew a lot of kids who struggled to get into good colleges. I also knew a lot of kids who went to very good colleges. The determinant was being smart, not income.
Also, I just saw which part of my previous post you highlighted. You might want to look up what "ostensibly" means.
Last edited by BannedForViews; 2016-08-16 at 04:10 AM.
For someone being dismissive of wild conspiracy theories, you're espousing one yourself that no sociologist or economist worth a darn would agree with.
Economic success in the modern world is not a meritocracy. If it were, you'd never find someone working at a low-end job like wait staff who "makes it" and becomes a movie star or pop singer, because their merit would have guaranteed their success before they ever got stuck working that job. It's primarily luck and networking. And "networking" is something that's much, much easier for people whose parents have existing connections.
omfg the jealousy is finally unveiled. Why do you give a shit what trump's dad did for his son? stop worrying about wtf other people have and improve yourself, by yourself. you don't have a millionaire dad? too bad so sad, fuckin deal with it and stop bitching. Go earn your own million, you'll feel so much better about yourself.
Do you even know where the whole $15/hr came from? The minimum wage in 1968, adjusted for inflation is a little over $10/hr. If you also adjust for increased productivity, it comes out to over $20/hr. The middle ground is $15. If a company can't handle starting off with a $15/hr min wage, they should not be in business.
You completely miss the point. Someone like Trump who brags how he "made it", does not want to acknowledge the breaks that he received in life over others. This happens quite often here in MMO posts. People LOVE giving their anecdotal story. As if every person lives the exact same life.
So you've admitted that it's not a meritocracy, and that the wealthy have advantages due to their class, contradicting your prior statement.
Yes, you could get fired for being incompetent, but baseline competency isn't a spectacularly difficult feat to accomplish. The banker's son is gonna have a much easier time getting into good colleges and getting into banking themselves than an equally-smart and equally-dedicated son of a single mom working as a meat packer.
Now, if you want to get into meat packing, he's probably got some advantages there, but the point is that banking's gonna be a lot more lucrative than meat packing.
The median income in the U.S., with adjust inflation has not risen in over past 30 years. So those people are not working hard?
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...d-for-decades/
Well... yeah. That's the point. To drive the demand side of the economy, which has been severely lagging this past decade or so.
OMG 13:37 - Then Jesus said to His disciples, "Cleave unto me, and I shall grant to thee the blessing of eternal salvation."
And His disciples said unto Him, "Can we get Kings instead?"
We all live different lives, so why be jealous? Be grateful for what you have. Want more? Go out and get it.
- - - Updated - - -
You're right. It's not a total meritocracy. I'd be ignorant to say nepotism doesn't exist, its all over Washington, and with the wealthy. But I don't necessarily view it as a bad thing unless their status was ill-gotten. Anything i may earn in my lifetime i'd want to pass on to my children. Leaving a legacy for your progeny so they don't have to struggle like you had to is part of the American dream. I can't speak for people in other countries. No matter what socioeconomic system one lives in there will always be those at the top, and those at the bottom. It's the biggest pyramid scheme around.