Claim: black people are more likely to be arrested for drug crimes than white people, despite violating drug laws at the same rate. This is racist.
Proof: Data provided a couple pages ago.
I've met my burden. The second part of the claim is just a description of the rest of the claim.
Drug arrests really don't have much to do with it either. You've made a leap to racism. But maybe drugs are just more prevalent because more people are buying them in higher crime areas. Sellers are selling because people are buying. Stop buying and pushers move elsewhere.
How does one know that there has been a drug law violation if one does not get arrested for it and therefor it be put in the books?
Sure, a couple pages ago, big graph, can't miss it. Black people smoke weed at a slightly higher rate, and white people use several hard drugs at a higher rate.
This can be a self fulfilling prophecy. Let's say you're a cop in my town. We're a moderate sized college town with a lot of wealthy out of towners going to school. Weed is legal in my state but we'll overlook this for the time being.Though as a cop, wouldn't you go to where the crime is more concentrated overall?
If you're a cop and you go downtown you could make a couple arrests for drug possession, and the crime rate would seem higher there. You could also go to the college and do the same. So when you decide where to go based on crime rates you end up going to places that are already policed more, reinforcing the cycle. So the poor and minority citizens in the "high crime" area get arrested and the rich white kids at the school don't.
The rate people are arrested at in an area isn't a measurement of how many people are breaking the law in a given area.
What do you expect from a bunch of miscreants like the 49ers and their fans?
Signed Sincerely,
Seattle Fan
Are you talking about http://i.imgur.com/lFaJLwN.png ?
What usage? Data really doesn't say anything about what is being used. Maybe usage rate arrests are higher due to harder, more addictive and dangerous drugs. Maybe white people get arrested less because it's mainly pot. Where, maybe, arrests are higher due to more crack or whatever. Simple supply and demand.
So there's a counter argument against racism. Basically it's an interpretation of the data, just as you are doing.
So I am not sure how usage rates necessarily correlate to arrests as if I do just about any kind of drug at my home and bother no one I will not be arrested. Seems like a weak jump to racism just by raw usage rates vs arrest rates. Now if you could show me where white people get stopped for drugs by police at the same rate as blacks and just get let go then that would be a much stronger link to racism.
Why do you assume same usage practices? I am just playing devils advocate to show the flaw in correlating the data based on an assumption.
- - - Updated - - -
Also I would be interested in seeing possession vs distribution (though more for my own curiosity) arrests rather than having them all lumped into drug offenses. Also arrests based on drug type would be interesting to see the breakdown of.