You couldn't even be arsed to watch the debate and yet you came here WITH YOU LYING about Clinton claiming she was never for the TPP durring the debate, and then attached some stupid link, why the hell should we believe your link now?
Please stop... seriously. You're just making a fool of yourself (admitedly, not as bad as Donald Dump did tonight, but still..)
Well whether or not they're right is irrelevant right? If you're touting basically the exact same policies that led the country on it's current path, and 70% think it's the wrong path, that seems not good for her right?
- - - Updated - - -
Saying I didn't watch the debate is the only lie here. The link is RealClearPolitics, pretty much the source everyone uses for polls.
I love how you're extrapolating all of these things that these polls do not indicate.Well whether or not they're right is irrelevant right? If you're touting basically the exact same policies that led the country on it's current path, and 70% think it's the wrong path, that seems not good for her right?
Could you try a bit harder to defend the dumpster fire we just saw? You're not doing a good job.
Is it just a myth then? I believe Obama proposed the same thing, to tax the rich, so if that didn't happen what makes anyone think Hilary can? It does make sense that's the rich wouldn't like being taxed more, and does it directly relate to consumers having more spending money? As far as I know having a strong middle class does help the rich too, but how do we get that back? Something tells me not by a higher minimum wage, or other proposed ideas.
I assume it hasn't been linked yet but NPR (Unbiased and Factual) has released a fact check of the night.
http://www.npr.org/2016/09/26/495115...dential-debate
tldr: Donald Trump said lots of bullshit and outright lied about things he has said in the past.
Oh jeesus you're more politically ignorant than I thought if you willingly watched the debates and MENTALLY believed she said she was never for the TPP.
You know what... keep talking! Everybody's getting a laugh out of it. It's like an encore presentation of Dump's baboonish ignorance! ^_^
/popcorn
What, that the wealthy are overtaxed in the USA, right now? That's not a "myth", it's a straight-up lie. The only significant one targeted at the wealthy that I'm aware of was the surtax on investment income, which wasn't the huge hike you apparently think.
1> The campaign is about the nominee's goals, not what they'll necessarily be able to achieve.I believe Obama proposed the same thing, to tax the rich, so if that didn't happen what makes anyone think Hilary can? It does make sense that's the rich wouldn't like being taxed more, and does it directly relate to consumers having more spending money?
2> The alternative to taxing the rich more is taxing them less. That's trickle-down economics. The money doesn't "trickle down". The entire argument has, through the magic of actual real events, been proven to be a meritless and intellectually bankrupt concept.
That magical "something", despite countries which DO have strong middle classes all having programs like the ones you're poo-pooing.As far as I know having a strong middle class does help the rich too, but how do we get that back? Something tells me not by a higher minimum wage, or other proposed ideas.
Trump just self-destructed during the debate lol, there goes his chance of winning
Here's the report, pulling from a factchecker site that linked to it, FWIW; https://www.economy.com/mark-zandi/d...c-Policies.pdf
Now Hillary will go home and sleep for 5 days while trump continues to rally the people. Trump is going to steamroll her on November 8th.
Oh come on.
Economies of scale make this kind of stuff easier to implement across larger populations, not harder.
And no; your whole argument about "job makers" is just the trickle-down garbage again. It was tried. They put trickle-down policies in place. And the jobs never appeared. Because wealthy people who have more money don't hire people to do nothing, they just enjoy having more money. The idea that they'd spend it on jobs they don't need done out of some sense of charity is such a mind-bogglingly dumb concept that it's shocking it ever got traction.
If you want to increase jobs, you need to increase consumer demand, which will drive hiring to meet that demand, and the only way to boost consumer demand is to increase the spending capital of the consumer classes. That's the middle and working classes.
You're advocating for the failed economic lies that created the pattern of recessions that the USA has faced since Reagan.