He looks like a f*cking twat.
I've got nothing against the company using male models to promote their product. If you want to wear makeup, regardless of gender, then all power to you.
but that guy really does look like a f*cking tosser.
Any other definition for the geniouses using the nature argument makes literally zero sense. If you argue something "isn't natural" Then it pretty much has to mean you can't find it in the nature without manipulation. And the minute you manipulate something from it's "natural" form, it's literally no different than manipulating something else, such as humans.
What's your point exactly? To argue for sake of arguing?
You never make a human chromosomally female though. At least not with current methods. So one could carry that argument as to why someone born male will never be female if one wants.
My point is your definition of natural is shite and you're putting words into other people's mouths as evidenced by your "geniuses" argument. So my arguing here is about as meaningful as yours.
Dunno why people are angry, not their choice who goes on the cover of a magazine. Naturally feminine or not, Covergirl's choice to put the fellow on the cover for whatever reason they want to put them on it. No reason to be angry over it, so it's a dude who looks feminine, their choice to be that way. Freedom, Liberty, and all that jazz, they wanna be that way good for them.
As for the statement of it being a pointless attempt a publicity, that's all magazines are. Everything about them is to generate publicity in order to sell themselves, so kinda magazines doing what magazines are meant to do. So even more a non story than it already was, but people have to make mountains out of mole hills. It's likely tied to a sense of insecurity that drives them to rant and rave at anything that isn't the way they want it to be, oh well keeps trolls with a collection of easy targets I suppose.
Oh, so now you mix nature argument with chromosomes? What does human chromosomes have to do with anything else nature related? As to anyone else before wanting to go down the chromosome argument, I'd suggest looking up what variations exist. Wasn't so simple, was it?
Not that I truly expect you to bother. Willful ignorance is a thing.
Edit. Why don't you actually cut the crap and come to the real point. You don't like women being able to transition to man, or vise versa. Trying to come up with irrelevant justifications are extremely poor way to hide your real point. Always the same with people like you.
Put a weird boy on their magazine and got tons of free PR and social points. Sounds like a smart move.
Covergirl? Isnt that sexist??
There is the sad paradox of a world which is more and more sensitive about being politically correct, almost to the point of ridicule, yet does not wish to acknowledge or to respect believers’ faith in God
This doesn't impact me in any way, so I couldn't care less.
Do people really have nothing else going on in their lives that a magazine cover upsets them?
If we're to judge makeup the same way we judge art, those eyebrows look cartoonishly big. Also not big on the nose ring. I don't care that it's a guy.
#subjectiveopinion
Take a break from politics once in awhile, it's good for you.
bwahaha that dude is ugly xD
To Topic: THats a shame, they show a ugly tranny instead of a REAL Woman, shameful display.