Iraqi refugee rapes 10 year old boy, Supreme court thinks boy gave consent

[Evil Midnight Bomber]

Yeah I also agree that, if the criminal wasn't a refugee, but a white male, and if the victim was a 10yr girl instead of a boy, he would have been crucified publicly by now.

If he wasn't a refugee, but a white male, and if the victim was a girl, some of the same people screaming to string this guy up would be like "Well, how do we know she didn't consent at the time but regretted it afterwards so she said it was rape".

[Dextroden]

According to you you cannot consent under the age of consent. So they raped each other.

Got it. Everything is child rape now.

Low effort bait.

[Evil Midnight Bomber]

hitler was a socialist. do research

Hitler was a Fascist. do research.

[Xanjori]

Got it. Everything is child rape now.

Low effort bait.

What, I'm repeating what you said. Are you admitting to baiting now?

[announced]

sounds like members of NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love association)would be very comfortable in Austria.

from Southpark

[Dextroden]

What, I'm repeating what you said. Are you admitting to baiting now?

You never gave me an age of consent or if there are actual laws for double underage, if they actually are.

What law let's ten year olds consent to full grown men?

[Xar226]

Their rape laws require proving something that the lower court did not prove, so the conviction was tossed pending a new trial.

This is called the rule of law, and it's working fine.

Don't like the law? Push to change it.

[Mafic]

Less likely.
You're being obtuse.


And I know of a guy that killed because his steak wasn't properly well-done.

Do you agree that people are more likely to commit murder when the punishment for robbery is the death penalty?

No.

Criminals the vast majority of the time have the prime directive to escape not murder. Hanging around to murder witnesses is a Hollywood construction as it increases the chances of being caught or more people witnessing the crime.

[Xanjori]

You never gave me an age of consent or if there are actual laws for double underage, if they actually are.

What law let's ten year olds consent to full grown men?

None, that's why he is going to prison for sexually abusing a child. What is it you don't understand here?

[Deleted]

What law let's ten year olds consent to full grown men?

I know it's tempting but he is clearly just baiting. Just let it go and let him wander off into his cave.

[Dextroden]

None, that's why he is going to prison for sexually abusing a child. What is it you don't understand here?

And that's why he is getting a retrial because, apparently, they can. According to the Supreme Court.

- - - Updated - - -

I know it's tempting but he is clearly just baiting. Just let it go and let him wander off into his cave.

I'm bored and want to see him keep arguing to fuck ten year olds. Leave him be.

[waitwutt]

Hitler was a Fascist. do research.

didn't say he wasn't maybe he was both. I knew youd come back with do your research. http://www.bruceonpolitics.com/2016/...red-to-hitler/ .the quote alone tells you im right.

[Deleted]

I'm bored and want to see him keep arguing to fuck ten year olds. Leave him be.

Oh, I understand. Have fun then. I am off to do something productive instead. Like humping a pillow or something.

[Dextroden]

Oh, I understand. Have fun then. I am off to do something productive instead. Like humping a pillow or something.

Make sure it consented first.

[Evil Midnight Bomber]

didn't say he wasn't maybe he was both. I knew youd come back with do your research. http://www.bruceonpolitics.com/2016/...red-to-hitler/ .the quote alone tells you im right.

But you denied the comparison to Hitler on the Basis that Hitler was a socialist....but the comparison to Hitler is based on Fascism, not socialism.

[Luxxor]

Yes, they do...and, if you're a Priest, the Catholic Church will even help you cover it up.

Nothing is wrong with religion.

[Xanjori]

I know it's tempting but he is clearly just baiting. Just let it go and let him wander off into his cave.

I mean are you simple?

Let me put this really clearly for you.

Pete has sex with a 15 year old, Pete gets arrested and sent to prison for sexually abusing a child. Pete was 19 and the girl was his GF, she "consented" in as much as she wanted it.

Dave forced a 15 year old to have sex with him. They want to make sure Dave gets a more serious sentence than Pete, because on top of having sex with an underage he raped her. So they make provisions in the law for this. Its a bit more like a standard rape trial on top of the statutory rape trial, to prove the girl didn't consent.

Do you understand this?

[s_bushido]

Their rape laws require proving something that the lower court did not prove, so the conviction was tossed pending a new trial.

This is called the rule of law, and it's working fine.

Don't like the law? Push to change it.

Yeah, but that response wouldn't fit the "lol multiculturalism" narrative people like to push whenever something happens involving a Muslim.

[Wyrt]

It just sounds like they're going to retry the case while the guy is still in prison in the mean time.

[Evil Midnight Bomber]

I'm bored and want to see him keep arguing to fuck ten year olds. Leave him be.

Actually, what he is arguing is that the Supreme Court are merely fulfilling their role.

In their understanding of the law...the Prosecution's case did not meet with the standards set.

They are not saying that the boy may have given consent...legally speaking, he cannot do that. That's why the conviction of sexual abuse stands.

They are saying that prosecution did not make the case that the boy was an unwilling participant and the the accused used force against him.