Democratic Election 2016 - Hillary Clinton Megathread [OFFICIAL]

[TrumpIsPresident]

Where are the unedited tapes?

Known criminal who has produced fraudulent material before. Paid by Trump. Refuses to release supposedly damning evidence.

Gee, I wonder what's going on there?

What the fuck are you drawing your conclusion from if it isn't the "few words said here and there"? That's all the fucking video is.

I have no idea but there's enough continuous footage to clearly establish that a conversation about a specific thing took place which was the entire point.

The conversations were pretty specific AND the points of which were repeated at different times by different individuals, ie corroboration.

If it was manufactured then how come so many people were all saying the same thing?

Plus both of the high ranking people were both fired after the fact.

If it was a pure edit job to change the intent, such as with oh lets say Trayvon's 911 tapes for example, then why fire those men?

And saying known criminal paid by trump refuses to release is sophistry to detract from what you can actually see in those interviews.

[May90]

Millions of Americans who are fed up with government corruption and lack of defending our interests. Lowering taxes, encouraging new job creation, protecting the 2nd Amendment, better trade deals, lower health care costs, stronger military. Pro life. To name but just some. I am sure however, yourself and many others on here will disagree he does. But you did ask and many think he can deliver on those.

Trump says that not paying taxes makes him smart and brags about his wealth daily, and you seriously think he will represent people who are fed up with government corruption? What sense does it make to elect a selfish billionaire with horrible business reputation to try to solve the problem of corruption? You might as well just invite some African dictator, because they are usually the ones talking about defeating corruption the most - while offshoring governmental belongings to personal Swiss accounts.

I'm not even talking about his outrageous ignorance about everything related to economy. Frankly, I'm not even sure he understands what "corruption" stands for. But sure, he's made populist promises, so he definitely will deliver on these! Eh, folks... You don't learn from history, at all.

[RobertoCarlos]

Professional spinster Loretta Lynch spins so much it makes your head spin, cant even answer basic questions to congress.

[Espe]

Trayvon's 911 tapes

What does George Zimmerman stalking and killing a kid have to do with a known criminal being hired by the Trump campaign to pump out propaganda?

[Cthulhu 2020]

Here 1, took only 10secs to find it.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/po...ion_probe.html

"Days after searching the Delaware County office of a Democratic grassroots organization for evidence of voter-registration fraud, state police on Thursday raided a second office - this one in Philadelphia..."

Funny how voter ID laws don't do anything to stop voter REGISTRATION fraud, huh?

[Orbitus]

Funny how voter ID laws don't do anything to stop voter REGISTRATION fraud, huh?

And so far they haven't even found any registration fraud so far as I have heard.

[Hooked]

Funny how voter ID laws don't do anything to stop voter REGISTRATION fraud, huh?

If that were the case you would be in favor of them.

[The Emperor]

Professional spinster Loretta Lynch spins so much it makes your head spin, cant even answer basic questions to congress.

That is so indicative of what Hillary is all about - duplicioutous, hypocritical nature and never answering firmly on any issue, just so it could be spun around easier next time. Trump should definetely look into the issue of this "attorney general"(what a disgrace, I mean, really) as well, and maybe have her prosecuted.

[JohnBrown1917]

I heard WikiLeaks was going to start releasing the big surprises soon. I'm almost giddy with excitement, what could it be?.

They'll finally reveal they have been extremely biased and just wanted the non-americans to lose faith it them.

[lockedout]

Clinton directed her maid to print out classified materials.

As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents — including ones containing classified information — from her house in Washington, DC, e-mails and FBI memos show. But the housekeeper lacked the security clearance to handle such material.

In fact, Marina Santos was called on so frequently to receive e-mails that she may hold the secrets to E-mailgate — if only the FBI and Congress would subpoena her and the equipment she used.

Clinton entrusted far more than the care of her DC residence, known as Whitehaven, to Santos. She expected the Filipino immigrant to handle state secrets, further opening the Democratic presidential nominee to criticism that she played fast and loose with national security.

Clinton would first receive highly sensitive e-mails from top aides at the State Department and then request that they, in turn, forward the messages and any attached documents to Santos to print out for her at the home.

Among other things, Clinton requested Santos print out drafts of her speeches, confidential memos and “call sheets” — background information and talking points prepared for the secretary of state in advance of a phone call with a foreign head of state.

Modal Trigger
Marina SantosPhoto: Ron Sachs
“Pls ask Marina to print for me in am,” Clinton e-mailed top aide Huma Abedin regarding a redacted 2011 message marked sensitive but unclassified.

In a classified 2012 e-mail dealing with the new president of Malawi, another Clinton aide, Monica Hanley, advised Clinton, “We can ask Marina to print this.”

“Revisions to the Iran points” was the subject line of a classified April 2012 e-mail to Clinton from Hanley. In it, the text reads, “Marina is trying to print for you.”

Both classified e-mails were marked “confidential,” the tier below “secret” or “top secret.”

Santos also had access to a highly secure room called an SCIF (sensitive compartmented information facility) that diplomatic security agents set up at Whitehaven, according to FBI notes from an interview with Abedin.

From within the SCIF, Santos — who had no clearance — “collected documents from the secure facsimile machine for Clinton,” the FBI notes revealed.

Just how sensitive were the papers Santos presumably handled? The FBI noted Clinton periodically received the Presidential Daily Brief — a top-secret document prepared by the CIA and other US intelligence agencies — via the secure fax.

A 2012 “sensitive” but unclassified e-mail from Hanley to Clinton refers to a fax the staff wanted Clinton “to see before your Netanyahu mtg. Marina will grab for you.”

Yet it appears Clinton was never asked by the FBI in its yearlong investigation to turn over the iMac Santos used to receive the e-mails, or the printer she used to print out the documents, or the printouts themselves.

http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton...ied-materials/

This crook just doesn't care.

[Zandalarian Paladin]

Thank you all for taking the bait.

Because the context was never an issue.

The matter reported on was exactly what was said in the interview, not a conclusion drawn from a few words said here and there.

Please, don't mix whom side I'm on. But I just have seen the same thing done so many time by both Republicans and Democrats -- it's, per definition, a fallacy. I can't possibly back anything up with that kind of reasoning.

- - - Updated - - -

They'll finally reveal they have been extremely biased and just wanted the non-americans to lose faith it them.

Right. Let me remind you something:

https://wikileaks.org/irq/

[JohnBrown1917]

Right. Let me remind you something:

https://wikileaks.org/irq/

Does not change what I said.

[Zandalarian Paladin]

Does not change what I said.

But it does. Claiming Wikileaks is biased is wrong on so many level, when six years ago they've released some of the most incriminating evidence of war crimes from the Republican party.

[JohnBrown1917]

But it does. Claiming Wikileaks is biased is wrong on so many level, when six years ago they've released some of the most incriminating evidence of war crimes from the Republican party.

We are talking about Trump here, not your shitty republicans.
All wikileaks does is make me hate the US more, Im really starting to think they deserve Trump.

[Zandalarian Paladin]

We are talking about Trump here, not your shitty republicans.

That has to be the most disingenuous answer I've read in a while.

[JohnBrown1917]

That has to be the most disingenuous answer I've read in a while.

So you have nothing to say about it? Then why don't they release any dirt on Trump? Why are they focused 100% on Clinton? Is that really the most important thing they could release to the world?



I really have no reason to believe wikileaks on anything any more, fuck assange.

[Zandalarian Paladin]

So you have nothing to say about it? Then why don't they release any dirt on Trump? Why are they focused 100% on Clinton? Is that really the most important thing they could release to the world?



I really have no reason to believe wikileaks on anything any more, fuck assange.

Umm... Wikileaks does not hack.

Do you know what this mean?

This mean that they're publishers. They publish.

Do you know what they publish?

Every single thing they receive, that is proved to be true.

So, your question as to why nothing about Trump?

It's simple. Nobody sent them anything about him. They've repeatedly asked people to send them information about Trump if they had some. Nobody did.

[PizzaSHARK]

But it does. Claiming Wikileaks is biased is wrong on so many level, when six years ago they've released some of the most incriminating evidence of war crimes from the Republican party.

Wikileaks is incredibly biased. It's become Assange's personal little vendetta machine over time. They have very clear goals, very clear biases.

[Zandalarian Paladin]

Wikileaks is incredibly biased. It's become Assange's personal little vendetta machine over time. They have very clear goals, very clear biases.

Please, do tell how so, and where you get your own information.

[JohnBrown1917]

Umm... Wikileaks does not hack.

I know that. But they still feel the need to highlight the whole spirit cooking bullshit.

They've repeatedly asked people to send them information about Trump if they had some. Nobody did.

Any reason to trust them?

Every single thing they receive, that is proved to be true.

How?