Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump

[lockedout]

Despite Assange and the report saying that they -were-.

So clearly, someone's lying. I'm willing to bet it's the FBI.

So then it's possible the CIA is lying about this right? Wouldn't you be willing to bet?

[Fadeslol]

That's not what the report says.

Yes but RNC came out and said it wasn't hacked. And NYTimes asked the RNC and they said no but they still put out the article.

https://twitter.com/seanspicer/statu...42009778688000

[Bullettime]

Despite Assange and the report saying that they -were-.

So clearly, someone's lying. I'm willing to bet it's the FBI.

Yeah Assange claimed they were but weren't going to release the information. The CIA told Congress that both sides, and Trump himself, were all compromised which forced a split in the party.

The FBI has just been showing how partisan they are because they have a lot to gain from a Trump presidency.

[Elegiac]

Yes but RNC came out and said it wasn't hacked. And NYTimes asked the RNC and they said no but they still put out the article.

https://twitter.com/seanspicer/statu...42009778688000

It's in the RNC's interests to claim they weren't hacked.

- - - Updated - - -

So then it's possible the CIA is lying about this right? Wouldn't you be willing to bet?

Not really. There's been shit floating around for a while pointing to Russian involvement, the issue was that Obama did nothing so as not to be contentious and McConnell axed any further investigation for 'reasons'.

[Fadeslol]

Despite Assange and the report saying that they -were-.

So clearly, someone's lying. I'm willing to bet it's the FBI.

https://twitter.com/seanspicer/statu...42009778688000

[Wells]

Yes but RNC came out and said it wasn't hacked. And NYTimes asked the RNC and they said no but they still put out the article.

https://twitter.com/seanspicer/statu...42009778688000

Wait, you mean to tell me that the RNC said something that made it look like they weren't benefiting from Russian intelligence operations?

And yeah, the NYT still published, because a political party making a claim doesn't dictate reality.

[Elegiac]

https://twitter.com/seanspicer/statu...42009778688000

Of course the RNC would claim as such if someone had gotten a hold of their dirty laundry.

[Fadeslol]

It's in the RNC's interests to claim they weren't hacked.

- - - Updated - - -



Not really. There's been shit floating around for a while pointing to Russian involvement, the issue was that Obama did nothing so as not to be contentious and McConnell axed any further investigation for 'reasons'.

It's in the CIA's best interests since they are known liars also. Although RNC is shit too.

[lockedout]

Wait, you mean to tell me that the RNC said something that made it look like they weren't benefiting from Russian intelligence operations?

And yeah, the NYT still published, because a political party making a claim doesn't dictate reality.

"We contacted the FBI months ago when the DNC issue came about," Priebus said on ABC's "This Week." "They’ve reviewed all of our systems. We have hacking detection systems in place. And the conclusion was then, as it was again two days ago, when we went back to the FBI to ask them about this, that the RNC was not hacked."

[Wells]

"We have evidence that the RNC is benefiting from Russian Intelligence, but they say they aren't, so I guess no story"

[Bullettime]

It's in the RNC's interests to claim they weren't hacked.

- - - Updated - - -



Not really. There's been shit floating around for a while pointing to Russian involvement, the issue was that Obama did nothing so as not to be contentious and McConnell axed any further investigation for 'reasons'.

And the evidence that has been seen and shared was considered damning enough for McCain and Graham to go across the aisle for a bipartisan coalition pressuring Obama to make the information public.

McCain and Graham aren't going to suddenly throw their lot in with Democrats unless there's actually information.

[Fadeslol]

Wait, you mean to tell me that the RNC said something that made it look like they weren't benefiting from Russian intelligence operations?

And yeah, the NYT still published, because a political party making a claim doesn't dictate reality.

Yea because NYT doesn't report read news.

[Wells]

"We contacted the FBI months ago when the DNC issue came about," Priebus said on ABC's "This Week." "They’ve reviewed all of our systems. We have hacking detection systems in place. And the conclusion was then, as it was again two days ago, when we went back to the FBI to ask them about this, that the RNC was not hacked."

A) That is, again, still just the RNC saying a thing
B) I'll take the CIA's evaluation on foreign intel activities over the FBIs.

Yea because NYT doesn't report read news.

Your definition of "real news" apparently is just "whatever the RNC says happened".

[Elegiac]

And the evidence that has been seen and shared was considered damning enough for McCain and Graham to go across the aisle for a bipartisan coalition pressuring Obama to make the information public.

McCain and Graham aren't going to suddenly throw their lot in with Democrats unless there's actually information.

The response is going to be 'McCain and Graham are RINOs!'

[Shadowmelded]

RNC was never hacked.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...ussian-hackers

[Fadeslol]

A) That is, again, still just the RNC saying a thing
B) I'll take the CIA's evaluation on foreign intel activities over the FBIs.

Yes because the CIA tells the truth.

[Bullettime]

The response is going to be 'McCain and Graham are RINOs!'

Which would be fucking hilarious and they could get buried in the amount of shit telling them how wrong they are. McCain and Graham have been two of the GOP's golden boys for years.

This is the main reason I'm even really taking notice of the whole thing. It's not a partisan temper tantrum. High status members of the GOP have seen the evidence and decided to throw their lot in with the opposing party because they consider it damning enough.

[lockedout]

A) That is, again, still just the RNC saying a thing
B) I'll take the CIA's evaluation on foreign intel activities over the FBIs.



Your definition of "real news" apparently is just "whatever the RNC says happened".

It happened on American soil not overseas.
It's what the FBI says happened.

[Elegiac]

"We contacted the FBI months ago when the DNC issue came about," Priebus said on ABC's "This Week." "They’ve reviewed all of our systems. We have hacking detection systems in place. And the conclusion was then, as it was again two days ago, when we went back to the FBI to ask them about this, that the RNC was not hacked."

The FBI under Comey has demonstrated a clear conflict of interest in this election, and their 'review' can be discounted as such.

[Wells]

Yes because the CIA tells the truth.

Dude, your position is literally that we should take the RNC on its word.

Fuck off with this.