So conceding the language of the law does apply to the site, now it's just a matter of "how much area"? Have you taken a step back and thought about why you are upset about this? Seems to me you just want to make a narrative out of this, and will suspend critical thinking in favor of an agenda. The clear point here is, that the president has the authority to do this, and therefore any critique should be more along the lines of "in my opinion I disagree with...", rather than "he's performing an illegal act and abusing his powers because I feel". If you just add, in my opinion before you make assertions then you wouldn't have to back it up with empirical evidence, we can just have a discussion as to why you disagree with said decision.