About the supposed Russian hack

[belleflop]

The only evidence we got was a piece of code from free software from the Ukraine. How is that prove that highly sophisticated Russian intelligence is doing a hack if they use PUBLIC DOMAIN FREEWARE... wtf...



Every scriptkiddy could have used that software.

No, just no. False and misinformation in one post. Bravo.

[Celista]

When has russia ever been our enemy besides in a propaganda war? How many armed conflicts has the west and russia had? Indochina and korea? proxy at best

russia is the boogeyman and always has been

I firmly believe they will be allies when ww3 breaks out (just like ww 1 and 2) , I'd get infracted if i told you who i think the enemy will be

Should worry more about North Korea than the Middle East, most wealthy Middle Easterners surreptitiously throw money towards US politicians. We are more allies in that region than not.

[Seani]

The wikileaks founder Julian Assange already said that Russia wasn't their source.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...overnment.html

[Elegiac]

The wikileaks founder Julian Assange already said that Russia wasn't their source.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...overnment.html

Why exactly should we believe Assange about, you know, anything?

[Seani]

Why exactly should we believe Assange about, you know, anything?

Not you again

[Cerus]

What fucking crimes?

Seriously? Using a private email server and deleting emails as a gov employee is a crime numbnuts.

[belleflop]

The wikileaks founder Julian Assange already said that Russia wasn't their source.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...overnment.html

Fox news is not a reputable new organization (that's why they are called fox entertainment news). Julian Assange is not a creditable source. Do we have any critical thinking people left in America? We really need context, data, and most importantly people to be able to use their higher cognitive thinking skills, not just use duck speak and be ok with false/misleading/misinformation. Seriously

[Seani]

Fox news is not a reputable new organization (that's why they are called fox entertainment news). Julian Assange is not a creditable source. Do we have any critical thinking people left in America? We really need context, data, and most importantly people to be able to use their higher cognitive thinking skills, not just use duck speak and be ok with false/misleading/misinformation. Seriously

Fox News did the interview, plenty of other media outlets reported on this. I heard the interview myself on the radio. I didn't give out any false information, you just want to argue for the sake of arguing. If you don't want to believe Julian Assange that's your business.

[Deleted]

Why exactly should we believe Assange about, you know, anything?

He is the head of an organization exposing government corruption for the past 20 years, with a provable track record of 100% legitimacy.
I believe it's up to you to prove why we shouldn't trust him.

Inb4 "rape" accusations in sweden lol

[Deleted]

Why exactly should we believe Assange about, you know, anything?

Because democrats want him dead for the information he provides and because he has given up his own freedom and a chance of a normal life to fight corruption.

[belleflop]

Seriously? Using a private email server and deleting emails as a gov employee is a crime numbnuts.

Again this is wrong. If you were paying attention no crime was committed. Was the private server distasteful and reckless, yes. Did others in government (Colin Powel, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, Chris Christie, Rick Perry, Bobby Jindal, Condoleezza Rice) use private servers, yep. Was it distasteful and reckless, yep, in all cases. None of these cases had sufficient evidence that a crime was committed.

There were many investigations opened in regards to the emails, as we all know. The deleted emails are still a source of damnation because none of us (except Hilliary) know what was in them. To that I say I agree there is a degree of suspicion. Considering Republicans exploited this to no end and used it as their main catalysis for winning I'd say regardless of how you see it the deleted emails did prove to be found guilty, in the court of public opinion.

- - - Updated - - -

Fox News did the interview, plenty of other media outlets reported on this. I heard the interview myself on the radio. I didn't give out any false information, you just want to argue for the sake of arguing. If you don't want to believe Julian Assange that's your business.

Please review information on Julian Assange and get back to me. Fox entertainment news agenda and bias is clear, and sourcing a person such as Julian is absolute dumpster journalism.

[Deleted]

Fox news is not a reputable new organization (that's why they are called fox entertainment news). Julian Assange is not a creditable source. Do we have any critical thinking people left in America? We really need context, data, and most importantly people to be able to use their higher cognitive thinking skills, not just use duck speak and be ok with false/misleading/misinformation. Seriously

Julian Assange is more credible than NYT, CNN, CNBC, Fox and most other news outlets together. When we say that the establishment and the leftist media is corrupt, you and tons of other of your kind basically answer with: This is fake news unless an establishment-backed media outlet states that it is corrupt.

Talk about not using higher cognitive thinking skills...

[Deleted]

Again this is wrong. If you were paying attention no crime was committed. Was the private server distasteful and reckless, yes. Did others in government (Colin Powel, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, Chris Christie, Rick Perry, Bobby Jindal, Condoleezza Rice) use private servers, yep. Was it distasteful and reckless, yep, in all cases. None of these cases had sufficient evidence that a crime was committed.

There were many investigations opened in regards to the emails, as we all know. The deleted emails are still a source of damnation because none of us (except Hilliary) know what was in them. To that I say I agree there is a degree of suspicion. Considering Republicans exploited this to no end and used it as their main catalysis for winning I'd say regardless of how you see it the deleted emails did prove to be found guilty, in the court of public opinion.

- - - Updated - - -



Please review information on Julian Assange and get back to me. Fox entertainment news agenda and bias is clear, and sourcing a person such as Julian is absolute dumpster journalism.

You know nothing of this scandal. You have not read any of the information yourself.
It is very obvious that you just parrot "mainstream media" talking points.

[Seani]

Please review information on Julian Assange and get back to me. Fox entertainment news agenda and bias is clear, and sourcing a person such as Julian is absolute dumpster journalism.

I just commented on what was said from the interview. Maybe he is lying maybe he isn't, but I am 100% positive that there was an interview and this is what he said. I am skeptical that you are privy to some secret information that was not in the mainstream news about Julian Assange. If you link me a source, I will look at it and consider your point.

[Deleted]

The wikileaks founder Julian Assange already said that Russia wasn't their source.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...overnment.html

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreill...aitors-america

Amazing how the media change their dogma, as fast they change underware.

[Deleted]

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreill...aitors-america

Amazing how the media change their dogma, as fast they change underware.

O'reilly is a partisan hack? Well, I'm shocked!

[Graeham]

By "woken up" you mean they listened to the propaganda from RT, sputnik and the alt-right sources that adapted their way of desinformation?

No? But carry on pushing the false narrative that everyone against a war with Russia is part of some 'Alt-Right' conspiracy. I, for one, do not want to see a war break out between America and Russia because Europe lies between them and would inevitably be dragged into it as well - perhaps even serving as the battleground itself.

[belleflop]

Julian Assange is more credible than NYT, CNN, CNBC, Fox and most other news outlets together. When we say that the establishment and the leftist media is corrupt, you and tons of other of your kind basically answer with: This is fake news unless an establishment-backed media outlet states that it is corrupt.

Talk about not using higher cognitive thinking skills...

Let me be clear: The website he runs "wikileaks" is a creditable (very important transparent) source as long as the documents are un-altered.
Julian Assange: He has a horrible record of having a predilection for conspiracy theories. Seriously, he's about to post "proof" we didn't go to the moon tomorrow.

Hope that clears it up.

- - - Updated - - -

You know nothing of this scandal. You have not read any of the information yourself.
It is very obvious that you just parrot "mainstream media" talking points.

Incorrect assumption. I read in depth all information regarding Hilary and her emails. Everyone that voted should of done the same. It's called gathering data and coming to a conclusion based on empirical facts. It should be the least a citizen does before they vote.

[Deleted]

O'reilly is a partisan hack? Well, I'm shocked!

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/09...release/212885

It's really funny.

[Ulmita]

The same people who train most F-16 pilots how to fly, the USAF and ANG. You know, they guys who dont kill a bunch of NATO personnel by not following proper preflight operations.

Accidents happen. You should look your record this year, its kinda astonishing. Also, they tell me something like 7-3, 11-4 in Red Flag last year. You guys are getting whooped in a regular basis.