[Podesta] Surely this can't be real? His password was 'password'...

[Deleted]

At this point you're just being a giant hypocrite. Enjoy your constant insults pretending you're in the right. Funnily enough while spouting just lies and lies, as to be expected from a Trumpette.

I'd suggest gaining any kind of actual empathy and objectivity. It'll do wonders in life. Goodbye.

I dont have empathy for criminals like Clinton, im sorry. Also, keep ignoring facts that go contrair to your feelings. It worked wonders for your kind this election.

[KrazyK923]

The supporters of him who got him elected, do not care about his tax records. Does not matter who else does. There is no law he has to. They mainly want a different direction for the country. His tax return results are the least of their concerns.

But the tax information about the Clinton Foundation was relevant, yeah?

It apparently doesn't matter that Trump is the first candidate in modern times to refuse to release his tax information. Which is actually relevant to the election since it would show if there are any strange ties people should know about before they vote.

Republicans, Trump, and his ilk fell over themselves to lie and lie about Clinton and her Foundation to try and say something nefarious was happening, ultimately to no actual prosecution or proof that it has happened. But then they throw a fit and pretend its not fair to ask the same of Trump or his businesses.

Far be it from me to say that they're giant hypocrites. I'm sure we all know they are by now.

[God Save The King]

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...ta-emails.html

His password was "p@ssw0rd", and it appears to be a set up e-mail, not his formal password.

Like at work my set-up login information was:

First Initial + Last name
First Name + Birth Year

i.e.

jsmith
John1985

and had a force changed immediately on logging in.

[Ghostpanther]

But the tax information about the Clinton Foundation was relevant, yeah?

It apparently doesn't matter that Trump is the first candidate in modern times to refuse to release his tax information. Which is actually relevant to the election since it would show if there are any strange ties people should know about before they vote.

Republicans, Trump, and his ilk fell over themselves to lie and lie about Clinton and her Foundation to try and say something nefarious was happening, ultimately to no actual prosecution or proof that it has happened. But then they throw a fit and pretend its not fair to ask the same of Trump or his businesses.

Far be it from me to say that they're giant hypocrites. I'm sure we all know they are by now.

Does not matter. In a little over 2 weeks he will be Mr. President. With all the power it wields, with a majority support in Congress. If the democrats refuse to see why they lost, in 2 more years, he may have a filibuster congress to work with.

[KrazyK923]

Does not matter. In a little over 2 weeks he will be Mr. President. With all the power it wields, with a majority support in Congress. If the democrats refuse to see why they lost, in 2 more years, he may have a filibuster congress to work with.

lol ok well good to know that it literally apparently doesn't matter what nefarious ties he may have that we'll never know.

Democrats lost because they had a bad candidate. The end.

You can stop pretending Hillary Clinton being a bad candidate suddenly makes Donald Trump not a sociopathic liar wanting to fuck over the entire country to line his pockets further.

[0ptimo]

This was the most sophisticated, multi-pronged attack into our government. Ever.





EVER.

[Deleted]

This was the most sophisticated, multi-pronged attack into our government. Ever.





EVER.

Even Debra Morgan had a better password: Fu**ingPassword

lol

[schwarzkopf]

Even if the robber used it as blackmail, at the end of the line the original owner of the child porn would still be held accountable. Yes?

Indeed, but given in this case there was no crime from the original owner (DNC etc) - the blackmailer is the only one left to face the music.

[Ghostpanther]

lol ok well good to know that it literally apparently doesn't matter what nefarious ties he may have that we'll never know.

Democrats lost because they had a bad candidate. The end.

You can stop pretending Hillary Clinton being a bad candidate suddenly makes Donald Trump not a sociopathic liar wanting to fuck over the entire country to line his pockets further.

That much I do agree with. But it was not the only reason she lost. The Democrats got their asses kicked in the district congressional and Governorship elections also.

[Belize]

A place that tells me things I don't want to hear telling me something I don't want to hear?!
Allegedly*

Oh you've finally cleaned the sand out of your own ears? Congrats.

[Wells]

That much I do agree with. But it was not the only reason she lost. The Democrats got their asses kicked in the district congressional and Governorship elections also.

Can't separate presidential performance from down ticket. The Dems didn't do so well in 2008 because of Pelosi's charms.

[Paranoid Android]

The story goes that they didn't even have a full cyber security working at DNC. They outsourced it. They called multiple times, but the person(s) in charge ignored the calls or thought they were a prank or something.

[Dextroden]

lol ok well good to know that it literally apparently doesn't matter what nefarious ties he may have that we'll never know.

Democrats lost because they had a bad candidate. The end.

You can stop pretending Hillary Clinton being a bad candidate suddenly makes Donald Trump not a sociopathic liar wanting to fuck over the entire country to line his pockets further.

Inverse is true. Just because Trump is an idiot doesn't magically make Clinton good. Or guilt free.

The irony of complaining about the Hillary email bullshit with no court case while arguing that Trump Totes stole the election by working with Russia.

[KrazyK923]

Inverse is true. Just because Trump is an idiot doesn't magically make Clinton good. Or guilt free.

Good thing I never claimed that.

However there are some few differences:

a.) Many of us who voted for Clinton were voting against Trump, not because they loved (or even liked) Hillary.
b.) Hillary was investigated for over a year and nothing was found. This never happened to Trump. We don't even know what his taxes state.
c.) Those of us who are talking about Russia aren't making shit up. We're listening to, at this point, literally the entire US intelligence committee. Even other Republicans are talking about how we need to investigate Russia. Meanwhile Trump is siding with Putin and Assange against his own party and country for even asking for an investigation.

You can try harder than that to make false equivalences.

[Dextroden]

Good thing I never claimed that.

However there are some few differences:

a.) Many of us who voted for Clinton were voting against Trump, not because they loved (or even liked) Hillary.
b.) Hillary was investigated for over a year and nothing was found. This never happened to Trump. We don't even know what his taxes are.
c.) Those of us who are talking about Russia aren't making shit up. We're listening to, at this point, literally the entire US intelligence committee. Even other Republicans are talking about how we need to investigate Russia. Meanwhile Trump is siding with Putin and Assange against his own party and country for even asking for an investigation.

You can try harder than that to make false equivalences.

1. And people like you regularly called people who voted against Clinton by voting Trump (despite his qualities) idiots. Lotta pot kettle there.

2. I'm still waiting on proof he assaulted those women who won't take him to court.

3. For the intelligence community. Iraq has WMDs. The Republicans. For anti-Trump fun.

[KrazyK923]

1. And people like you regularly called people who voted against Clinton by voting Trump (despite his qualities) idiots. Lotta pot kettle there.

Are you SERIOUSLY going to try and pretend the amount of people who are basically in love with Trump are the same for Clinton? I can't think of anybody but SJWs who loved Clinton. Meanwhile you (apparently?) are the literal first person I've ever met who voted for Trump because it was against Clinton rather than because they liked or loved Trump. His sycophants are incredibly well known, he did a victory tour for fucks sake. The last Democrat where its similar to this level is Obama. And even then, the amount of just utter worship people have for Trump seems more than that.

2. I'm still waiting on proof he assaulted those women who won't take him to court.

...what? lol. I never even claimed he for certain did those things. I said him bragging about it was more than enough for him to be disqualified. A rich sociopath who thinks he can do whatever he wants because he's rich. Furthermore this point you're responding to was about his taxes. I like how you just ignored that.

3. For the intelligence community. Iraq has WMDs. The Republicans. For anti-Trump fun.

Lol. Is this really the defense? Wow. I'm sure that's going to play well outside of sycophants. Good luck with that. You'd better have been served just posting the video of your Glorious Leader stating this with a complete utter lack of willingness to even investigate the claims. I'm done with you. I have no desire to continue on with a sycophant.

I wish you luck on the next four years of blindly defending literally everything he does. Sounds tiring.

[Dextroden]

Are you SERIOUSLY going to try and pretend the amount of people who are basically in love with Trump are the same for Clinton? I can't think of anybody but SJWs who loved Clinton. Meanwhile you (apparently?) are the literal first person I've ever met who voted for Trump because it was against Clinton rather than because they liked or loved Trump. His sycophants are incredibly well known, he did a victory tour for fucks sake. The last Democrat where its similar to this level is Obama. And even then, the amount of just utter worship people have for Trump seems more than that.



...what? lol. I never even claimed he for certain did those things. I said him bragging about it was more than enough for him to be disqualified. A rich sociopath who thinks he can do whatever he wants because he's rich. Furthermore this point you're responding to was about his taxes. I like how you just ignored that.



Lol. Is this really the defense? Jesus christ.

I'm done with you. I have no desire to continue with a sycophant.

1. Yep. Touched a nerve by daring to compare people who voted for different people in the exact same way. Spoiler alert: Didn't vote for trump. So, welcome to the dust bin reserved for people who think everyone that didn't vote Clinton voted Trump.

2. I'm still waiting on proof of anything.

3. I now have to take two shots for your use of sycophant like it was a buzzword. Good job, non meme person.

[Cthulhu 2020]

I dont have empathy for criminals like Clinton, im sorry. Also, keep ignoring facts that go contrair to your feelings. It worked wonders for your kind this election.

Still waiting on those tax returns and all of Trump's emails.

You know, just to prove that he didn't really assault those women and do all that other stuff he's been accused of and there's evidence of him doing.

Since apparently that's your criteria for needing to release every single one of their personal files they've ever had. "There's some evidence to suggest that the did something wrong so they should release everything."

God it's hilarious that you've never demanding Trump do the same thing, and just ignore posts like this.

- - - Updated - - -

Oh you've finally cleaned the sand out of your own ears? Congrats.

It's even funnier when you realize that him and people like him were lumping Fox News in with the main stream media when they were talking about how they couldn't be trusted and were all liars and meanie poopey heads. You know, because they said some mean things about Trump.

[Damajin]

Even Debra Morgan had a better password: Fu**ingPassword

lol

Man I was thinking of this earlier when I read it, fucking hysterical. Top 5 show for me right there, good call out haha.

[RampageBW1]

Clearly Podesta was just trying to follow in the footsteps of Richard Stallman (found of GNU and the Free Software movement), and wanted an easy password to throw up his arms at the passwords wielding overlords! /facetious

Richard Stallman didn't really like passwords when they were introduced in the computer labs of MIT back in the mid 1970's, and tried to get everyone around him to use an empty string (just type enter) as their passwords. And of course the passwords weren't well encrypted back then so the security was just a joke anyway.