When you say that hardware can run a game, the implication is that the hardware can run some version of the game that actually resembles the game. To then absurdly reduce your argument to saying "Well, it could run the game if it looked like this:"
Is a bit ridiculous. Like, what is the point? That you can't possibly be wrong because
any game can be run on any system at
some level?
I guess I'm missing the point once the argument gets demeaned to this level.. If the game has to be translated to black and white 2d sprites to run on hardware, I'm going to vote with the other guys and say "It can't run the game."