Originally Posted by
Skroe
In some ways it has been. In some ways it hasn't. It's complicated.
In some ways through survelliance and national security, the President is more powerful than ever. Congress refusing to authorize Obama's campaign in Syria YEARS beyond the 60 day limit, while still allowing and funding said cmapaign, is evidence of that. Why don't they vote on an authorization for military force? Nobody wants to have it on their record if it goes sour, and it be used against them just as Iraq War votes were used against them. It's political cowardice. So on foreign afairs, the President is at the peak of his power.
In terms of budgets though, and i've touched this on defense and space issues many time, Barack Obama's deviation from the bipartisan consensus lead to his essential irrelevancy in the budgeting process. The budgets through the clinton and Bush years largely reflected the priorities of those administrations. There were differences to be sure. But the outlines were all there.
After 2010 though, Democrats and Republicans a like basically ended Executive Branch participation in the budget. Every year Obama offered up a Budget. And Every year Congress produced something (even if it didn't pass, thanks to political conflict) that looked completely different. Obama had some bones thrown to him, but there has certainly been a big step towards taking power of the purse out of the hands of the executive.
Why did this happen? John Bohner's ban on earmarks. Earmarks allowed Congress to consent to Presidential budgets. The ban on earmarks required what would otherwise be earmarks be structurally written in. Naively, it is better and more honest governing and accounting. Practically, it made the Presidential Budget Request essentially one giant work of fiction.
This has been the fortunate last line of Defense against Trump. while Congress will fight like hell over things like planned Parent hood and funding on renewable energy, the other 98% of the budget is largely uncontroversial. As I wrote in another thread today, the difference between how much Republicans want to raise defense and how much Democrats want to raise defense, is about 4% of the overall defense budget. Only in Bernie Sander's imagination is a $200 billion defense budget going to happen.
Earmarks are still gone. And Donald Trump minus earmarks will find his practical political power far weaker than Clinton, who briefly enjoyed the line item veto, and George W Bush, whose white house acted almost as a unitary government for a spell there.
It's going to be both. Stopping Donald Trump dead in his tracks and removing him as a matter of principle, and then replacing him with a better alternative.
It's not just that Donald Trump stands for things I disagree with. Him sitting on that office is him shitting on a proud and honest inheritance for all Americans. He is in so many ways, unworthy of his position. He must go. Impeachment or resignation. The date with destiny will be arranged and that better alternative put foward in tandem.