Ideologies are goal-oriented, not means-oriented. Fascists don't nationalize industries to nationalize industries; they do so because it is a means of returning industrial power into the hands of those it deems nationally pure. Nazis, for instance, were fine with private ownership over the means of production so long as the private owner supported, at least overtly, Nazi race science and Aryan supremacy.
This is nonsense. Further, it contradicts your above assertion that the central tenet of fascism is the expropriation of private assets for public use, as the TARP program and the auto industry bailouts were conducted with the express goal of preserving the existence of privately-owned commercial enterprises.The TARP program established to bail out US banks and automakers, for example, was fascist in nature.
Are Texas Republicans left-wing fascists?Fascism is, further, about taking control of the education system and turning it into an arm of the ruling party. Again, focus on state-sponsored curriculum control is a left-wing policy.
If that national interest is hierarchical in its goals then, yes, it is decisively right-wing in its ideological motivations. The left cares about abolishing hierarchy. The right cares about defending and asserting hierarchy as a response to radicalism. Everything else is contextual.Racially and ethnically motivated action in the name of supposed national interests is not the sole purview of the right wing, and uh... characterizing the hypothetical "Zionist oligarchy of Jewish bankers Illuminati" boogeyman espoused by certain fascist countries as a left-wing organization is quite humorous.
Ok so the bullshit started in the first couple of lines OP.
Nazis were the antithesis of conservatives. For starters conservatives are mostly Judeo/Christian based, nazis were pagans and athiests.
Which seems to be the vast majority of the liberal left as well. So a base fact of your bullshit statement is incorrect. Learn to read
There is the sad paradox of a world which is more and more sensitive about being politically correct, almost to the point of ridicule, yet does not wish to acknowledge or to respect believers’ faith in God
that's because at the top, both sides work together to control you and turn us into a population of sheep to be profited from by banks/multinational corporations
that's why both prominent political parties, the media, the celebrities, and the brainwashing centers known as universities, all rallied to try and stop trump
No they're not. Big government controlling everything is Left, not Right.
People try to come up with these massive explanations detailing the differences between Fascism, Communism, Social. All trying to sound like they're smart. They're not. It's real simple. The definition that matters is the one in my second sentence.
Haven't read the whole thread, but you just need to listen to Hitler's own words in describing his own system;
"Why," I asked Hitler, "do you call yourself a National Socialist, since your party programme is the very antithesis of that commonly accredited to socialism?"https://www.theguardian.com/theguard...eatinterviews1
"Socialism," he retorted, putting down his cup of tea, pugnaciously, "is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists.
"Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality, and unlike Marxism, it is patriotic."
His "socialism" was nationalist capitalism/corporatism, and was directly opposed to actual socialist thinking, to the extent of claiming that all socialist schools weren't "real socialism". Claiming that Hitler was akin to Marx is that even Hitler would have found ridiculous.
- - - Updated - - -
Authoritarianism leans neither left nor right. Claiming otherwise is propaganda, and nothing more. It's a completely separate political axis.
Lets see:
A centralized economy and a single party system.
Sounds pretty lefty to me.
No, fascism is authoritarian, militaristic government. In theory, populism is the opposite of fascism, because populism puts the desires of the people over authority. In a fascist state of mind, the most moral act is to obey authority. In a populist state of mind, the most moral act is to serve the will of the people. In practice, however, rampant populism has at times allowed fascist rulers to seize power.
Socialism is a government that uses tax revenue to provide social services to its citizens, effectively redistributing wealth (nearly all governments do this, but some do it more than others). In theory, you could have fascism and socialism at the same time, but they aren't related.
BTW, simply putting the word "socialism" in your name doesn't make you any more socialist, in the way that North Korea isn't a people's republic.
And? I'm gonna keep calling everyone on this site a Marxist. Not much better. Nazis were socialists by the way.
By all rational measure, the Nazis and Hitler were extremely right-wing and authoritarian. Historians have made this assessment because;
A). They were violently hostile to all center-left and far-left political parties for their entire existence as a party post Hitler. (sounds familiar)
B). They were violently nationalist, and anti-internationalist compared to the internationalism of the contemporary left. (too familiar)
C) They formed alliances with other far right governments. (I swear I’ve seen this recently)
D). They formed coalitions with the traditional right in electoral politics, aka the coalition government that made Hitler Chancellor. (it’s on the tip of my tongue)
E) They opposed class struggle, a central tenet of Marxists. (but conservatives tell me Nazism and Communism are the same thing, odd)
Basically, they were right wing because they defined themselves in opposition to the left.
Which is an inaccurate. Otto Strasser, the leader of the 'socialist' or 'left-wing Nazis', had been expelled from the party in July 1930 and his brother, Gregor Strasser, left it in late 1932. In both cases clashes with Hitler were to blame. So while Gregor was killed in the Night of the Long Knives, and Otto escaped into exile, both of them had been effectively purged prior to this.
Similarly, the list of victims in 1934 went far beyond 'left-wing' members of the party. Most of the violence fell on Ernst Röhm's SA, the downfall of which being largely a product of the potential threat it posed to Hitler. A number of conservative politicians were also killed. I think it's therefore more apt to look at the Night of the Long Knives as a 'clearing out' of all opposing poles of political opposition, and purge of fellow conservatives that were deemed too soft or unreliable (not loyal enough).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Long_Knives
It’s funny because those are all conservative practices, even all the talk about confiscation of guns, they’re really the only ones suggesting it as possible. Remind me how many guns did Obama take again? And tell me, which party promotes an open educational curriculum, which party stands for equality among people of different religion or skin color or gender, which party has been lashing out with violence and hate speech at anyone who disagrees with them (and which party thinks grabbing women by the pussy is sexual assault). If you honestly believe the conservative party is the party of openness and inclusion, then you're living in your own made up reality, and you have my pity.
Because the sources from wikipedia are almost 20 years old, back when the political spectrum was still widely thought as a single line: Left ------------------ Right
That made their protectionist and totalitarianism values stand out. Yet as we've expanded the way we analyze political spectrums, it became increasingly clear that beside their strong protectionist values, Nazis were actually pretty damn close to the "center-right". They also had several projects that were strongly on the left, but they were overshadowed by their absolutely disgusting elimination of anything they did not consider worthy. (And at the very end, the elimination of their left-wing allies within the party)
So yeah, Nazism had a completely hermetically closed autoritarian rule, a living hell. But it wasn't far right. It was Center-Right.
Last edited by Zandalarian Paladin; 2017-01-22 at 08:07 PM.
Google Diversity Memo
Learn to use critical thinking: https://youtu.be/J5A5o9I7rnA
Political left, right similarly motivated to avoid rival views
[...] we have an intolerance for ideas and evidence that don’t fit a certain ideology. I’m also not saying that we should restrict people to certain gender roles; I’m advocating for quite the opposite: treat people as individuals, not as just another member of their group (tribalism)..