President Trump Threatens to Send U.S. Troops to Mexico to Take Care of 'Bad Hombres'

[Mehrunes]

That's gonna be quite a crisis for USA then. In addition to a colation, I bet Texas will want to seperate, Clinton will rise as a pretender, and California particularists will be on a rise.

Oh, and republics get stability penalty only when a ruler dies in combat

Yeah, figured as much. -1 stability every few years would be too much. And there would be rebellions everywhere. Nationalist, religious (rather low religious unity after all), so on and so forth. Low republican traditions also gives some detrimental status effects.

[Cyberowl]

Countries with damaged diplomatic ties by Trump in 2 weeks: Mexico, China, Australia, Canada and the European countries that matter, a big chunk of TPP members.

Countries with impoved diplomatic ties by Trump in 2 weeks: Russia and the European "muh rapefuges" countries that mostly don't matter.

Picked a real winner there!

[Devonitar]

Yeah, figured as much. -1 stability every few years would be too much. And there would be rebellions everywhere. Nationalist, religious (rather low religious unity after all), so on and so forth. Low republican traditions also gives some detrimental status effects.

Huh, ironic. Religious unrest seems almost impossible for EU4 USA. They get +20% religious unity and no negative effect of intolerance.

Guess the game cannot predict everything

[sarahtasher]

BTW, it is odd, isn'it, that the Trumpits have the following defence ?


''It's not true, but if this was, it would be awesome''

[JohnBrown1917]

It's funny to see a bunch of pussies get triggered by someone with some balls. How dare he tell people that call themselves our allies to clean up their mess that's spilling into our yard or he will, unfathomable. The times they are a changin', no more capitulating to crazies and bleeding hearts, I wonder how well you hothouse flowers will do outside of your specialized environment.

If its suddenly okay to invade other countries again, us dutchies are going to take back new Amsterdam!

[Macaquerie]

And the fun thing is, Trump doesn't give a shit about those countries.

I honestly feel kind of sad for Eastern Europeans - so proud of themselves, and so very little to be proud of.

[Mehrunes]

Huh, ironic. Religious unrest seems almost impossible for EU4 USA. They get +20% religious unity and no negative effect of intolerance.

Guess the game cannot predict everything

Ah, I see. You could be right, as I said, I haven't played a republic in a while. And never played as US. Then again not sure if 20% bonus would cover the melting pot of today entirely.

[Flarelaine]

I honestly feel kind of sad for Eastern Europeans - so proud of themselves, and so very little to be proud of.

I know, right? I'd love to be the dude who goes out and tosses a rotten egg at Putin tonight (the czar is visiting us, yay!), but no one is allowed to get within even two blocks. They even welded the sewer lids down and prohibited all non-scheduled air traffic down to drones.

So what is it with dictators and insecurity?

[Darkeon]

I know, right? I'd love to be the dude who goes out and tosses a rotten egg at Putin tonight (the czar is visiting us, yay!), but no one is allowed to get within even two blocks. They even welded the sewer lids down and prohibited all non-scheduled air traffic down to drones.

So what is it with dictators and insecurity?

When plenty of people, even in these very forum, think it's okay to punch someone they do not agree with, I'd say safety is quite high on the list.

[Zandalarian Paladin]

By that logic, Mexico should send troops into the United States to kill Drug Addicts. I mean, if there were no drug addicts in the states, the cartels wouldn't have a reason to smuggle drugs across the border and then the USA wouldn't have any problems with Mexico.

But that would be fucking stupid.

Who said the US would go in to kill anyone? Conjecture, again?

So you're using a link about valid justification for war and how it's applicable here to explain how this action wouldn't be an act of war? Top tier logic right there. Also, since reading your own links is apparently super hard, read the part about post-WWII era usage of casus belli. Because, you know, that's the time we live in. Because it says that there is a casus belli if you defend yourself against an armed aggression on state level. Sorry, but cartels don't fit in here.




Celista apparently has, or had in the past, some semblance of hope for Trump to not be a total failure. She expressed that sentiment in some other threads.




You mean Trump doesn't get to send a diplomat and in few months gain a claim on Mexico City?

How about you calm down and take the time to read. Where did anyone speak of shooting or killing anyone? Tell me, please. No really, do tell where even the allegations that haven't been proved speak of killing citizens.

No really, please do.

[Beardedfreak]

This is all a hoax made by the mainstream media Mexico denies that Trump made the call to send troops down there.

[kamuimac]

So he is threatening war against the country we have less than zero reason to go to war against. You know what is a great idea after destabilizing the entire middle east? Destabilizing countries we have a massive land and sea border with.

God damn why couldn't we just get a giant meteor?

thats karma biting you back for inviding middle east /shrug

war is noting but a buinsess - clearly somebody in one of few corporations that live of war decided that not enough bloody $$$ are coming in from middle east.

[sarahtasher]

This is all a hoax made by the mainstream media Mexico denies that Trump made the call to send troops down there.

Does Alex Jones and Breitbart provide ''proofs'' before ordering agitprop attacks ?

[Dug]

Who said the US would go in to kill anyone? Conjecture, again?

It would kind of have to happen when dealing with cartels. The leaders will give up as soon as they have no where else to run to (and they have shit tons with their networks) but in the mean time they'll send plenty of foot soldiers as cannon fodder.

[zealo]

Who said the US would go in to kill anyone? Conjecture, again?

It comes included in the affair when you're dealing with drug cartels. Those people are incredibly well armed and organised, and its practically guaranteed bullets will be flying in any confrontation between US operatives and Cartel members.

[Independent voter]

The government of Mexico has said that Trump never Threatened to Send U.S. Troops to Mexico to Take Care of 'Bad Hombres

http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/...oops-to-Mexico

You all are being fooled.

[Scyclone]

The government of Mexico has said that Trump never Threatened to Send U.S. Troops to Mexico to Take Care of 'Bad Hombres

http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/...oops-to-Mexico

You all are being fooled.

But that doesn't support the lefts view about how Trump is such a horrible violent person! This must be one of those alternative facts stated by the government of Mexico! :P

[Zandalarian Paladin]

The government of Mexico has said that Trump never Threatened to Send U.S. Troops to Mexico to Take Care of 'Bad Hombres

http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/...oops-to-Mexico

You all are being fooled.

Another...

The stream of fake news knows no end.

I can't even express just how disappointed I am toward the US right now. Unethical president, unethical extremist groups, unethical medias and fascists protestors

[Flarelaine]

When plenty of people, even in these very forum, think it's okay to punch someone they do not agree with, I'd say safety is quite high on the list.

Oh, I don't aspire to actually punch Putin. The man is a f*king black belt among his other qualities.

But an egg that would probably land on his limo anyway... no harm, just a message.

[Deleted]

I bet you were in the trump dossier thread spouting the same line. How did that story work out?

Not great for the Russian sources mentioned in that Dossier, most of them has been found dead since.