https://sports.vice.com/en_us/articl...r-the-olympicsThe state of Rio—as well as the city itself—was broke before the Games began. Rio's revenue greatly relies on the price of oil, thanks to reserves tapped in the late 2000s. When global oil prices plummeted, Rio's cash flow dried up, and so did that of the biggest company in Brazil, Petrobras, the federally-owned oil company that has its headquarters and many refineries and factories in Rio. Federal bailout funds that kept Rio functioning for the Olympics are long gone, and, thanks to tax breaks given out to sponsors and other Olympics-adjacent companies, the state failed to raise any revenue from the three-week festivities. Today, the state owes some $31 billion to various creditors, including the federal government.
Petrobras is also at the center of a massive corruption scandal dubbed Lava Jato, "car wash," which involves more than $2 billion in bribes and kickbacks, some of which relates to the Olympics. Brazil's largest construction company, Odebrecht, is also central to Lava Jato. It oversaw more than half of the Olympics' building contracts and had its own bribery department to handle such affairs.
A few pictures of the infrastructure built for the olympics completely abandoned:
If there is anybody from england here, could you tell us, do the olympics brought any benefits to London? For what i have seen, most of the cities that hosted the olympics never made to properly use all the infrastructure built after the event.
Why the countries are so eager to get a chance to host the olympics when most of the time there is no relevant benefits to the country?