What does the far right and far left think of science, technology, and spaceships?

[willtron]

I'm a conservative, I think we should explore space, and invest heavily bio/nano technology, and alternative energy source. We need to cure aging fast, getting old is bad for humans, and the economy. We should continue to use which ever energy is cheapest in the mean time, until renewable energy gets cheaper, and stronger.

People getting old is bad for humans. We need a good old fashioned calamity to cull the weak.

[Deleted]

I'm a conservative, I think we should explore space, and invest heavily bio/nano technology, and alternative energy source. We need to cure aging fast, getting old is bad for humans, and the economy. We should continue to use which ever energy is cheapest in the mean time, until renewable energy gets cheaper, and stronger.

Theres a pretty cheap cure for getting old. Would actually save a lot of money in general

[Valstorm Warsong]

People getting old is bad for humans. We need a good old fashioned calamity to cull the weak.

Intelligent life is precious and should be protected.

[Blade Wolf]

Doesn't surprise me that that is the way you see it.

Can you prove the creationism is "bullshit"? And just because you think it is, others don't - so why do you think YOU get to decide? ( i am an atheist.)

BTW - fuck public schools. Much rather see kids going to the school of their choice instead being forced into going to public schools.

You're making the claim that creationism is true with fucking 0 evidence. It's up to you to prove creationism is true not the other way around.

[Cyberowl]

Theres a pretty cheap cure for getting old. Would actually save a lot of money in general

I can't help but to think that governments all over the world will become the biggest fangirls of euthanasia with the demographic developments. If those suckers wanna quit, let them.

[Gorgodeus]

There is no "far-left" in the US.

[unfilteredJW]

You're making the claim that creationism is true with fucking 0 evidence. It's up to you to prove creationism is true not the other way around.

Good luck with that.

Once you buy into the Big Lie, it makes swallowing all the other bullshit easier.

[Cyberowl]

Good luck with that.

Once you buy into the Big Lie, it makes swallowing all the other bullshit easier.

It's like amazon. Buy one Big Lie, get 50 emails advertising a slightly different Big Lie to you.

[Mad_Murdock]

There is no "far-left" in the US.

Far left, Regressive left, Ctrl-Left, cuckoos,Super Troopers, Power Rangers, whatever label you want to stick on the Identity politics, "we're all victims" group that is on the left. Just pick and title for that group a pass it around. I'm partial to Ctrl-Left cause it's sounds like a computer antonym for Alt-Right

[Garnier Fructis]

Can you prove the creationism is "bullshit"? And just because you think it is, others don't - so why do you think YOU get to decide? ( i am an atheist.)

In the widest sense of the term? No.

But specific flavors of creationism, in particular the kinds that keep trying to make their way into schools, can be proven to be bullshit. I'm talking young-Earth creationism, or intelligent design.

[zorkuus]

Technology is a liberal myth.

[Garnier Fructis]

I'm partial to Ctrl-Left cause it's sounds like a computer antonym for Alt-Right

Even if I disagree, this is pretty funny.

[Independent voter]

A lot of people on the left would rather see money go to some social program like paying off student loans than seeing the money going to NASA or the Center for Disease Control.

The left is not all that different from the right.

[willtron]

Intelligent life is precious and should be protected.

And yet Trump got elected, proof not all sentient life is intelligent.

[Tijuana]

I think we should build a huge space army and attack Mars ASAP. Ideally, full on nukes and everything. Because FUCK MARS, those guys are dicks.

All jokes aside, this NASA engine looks either so promising it's a game changer, or so good it surely must be a hoax.

[Dezerte]

You'd have to ask them, each one of them. All you're going to get here is gross generalizations.

[Liftbrul]

What does anybody think of science? It's good. Technological progress is great. Unless you're Amish, or just a luddite.

[Vargur]

Anarcho-socio-communist here, so quite far left.
I believe in a fully technological future, bionic implants, space colonisation and all that, free of (especially organised) religion, but not free of common sense, reason, logic and spirituality.

[Waynhim]

A lot of people on the left would rather see money go to some social program like paying off student loans than seeing the money going to NASA or the Center for Disease Control.

The left is not all that different from the right.

While the right actually defunds and undermines NASA and science in general... At least the left believes in science.

[Vargur]

Can you prove the creationism is "bullshit"? And just because you think it is, others don't - so why do you think YOU get to decide? ( i am an atheist.)

That's not how it works.
It's explained better here:
Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proved false (or vice versa). This represents a type of false dichotomy in that it excludes a third option, which is that: there may have been an insufficient investigation, and therefore there is insufficient information to prove the proposition be either true or false. Nor does it allow the admission that the choices may in fact not be two (true or false), but may be as many as four,

In essence, you must prove that something exists, you can't say "prove it doesn't exist", since there's no evidence of existing in the first place.