Last edited by Total Crica; 2017-02-21 at 01:49 AM.
This thread is long , it was probably already said, but.
'Just not having sex' argument is almost the same as 'Just not brething' argument.
There are certaing activities, like brething, having sex, eating healthy, living in safe environment, and similar, which are just basic rights to keep own health up that any human being should be able to do in a civilized society without fear of 'consequences' of just being a living being. ANY. Because they are pretty much the same as 'human rights'. Yet right now, women got more of them than men. Apparently women are superior to men, according to nowadays laws.
Last edited by mmoc8c38b7d291; 2017-02-21 at 02:09 AM.
Depends what you mean by 'free sex'.
In common meaning it means that by law men got barely a permission to get an orgasm while woman get permission to make them work for her (pretendig it's 'for a child') for the rest of his life. Details vary by country, but I don't see how just having a choice in unequal trade should matter in nowadays equality-centeret societies anyway.
When a man complains about a woman carrying a child he doesn't want, he's told "guess you should have thought about that before you had sex" and when a woman doesn't want a child and you tell her she should have thought about that before she had sex... oh wait you're not allowed to do so.
- - - Updated - - -
It's the man's property inside of her the merged with hers. It's a mutual product. I'm not for making a woman carry a baby she doesn't want, but I'm also for a man being able to opt out of child support when there's still time for a woman to abort. Otherwise if you're against that, then I go back to my original stance.
In biology, animals and whatnot... Yes.
BUT:
Modern societies try to become superior to biological, aminal or whatever instincts for the sake of not-that-much biological 'humans'.
Why the hell did you separete your reply into separete posts though? Effort enough makes me wanna just go get more beer and ignore it.