Originally Posted by
Stormdash
Why would a man in a de jure Christian nation consider the possibility he'd be charged for blasphemy, when the doctrine of said Christian religion requires that the document burned (the Quran) be false and misleading anyway? I mean, we're talking law here, not religion -- the only religion that a blasphemy law could ever logically apply to in a state that has an official religion, is the official religion. That religion as a matter of doctrine has several different authorities you could point to that would yield the conclusion that the Quran is rubbish, meaningless at best, actively deceptive and harmful at worst. How could defacing it, then, be blasphemy against the state religion of Denmark? Unless, as I pointed out above, we must now treat Islam as being the new official state religion of Denmark.