Sweden a third world country by 2030? No....!
We are supposed to meet with Vulcans in 46 years
Sweden a third world country by 2030? No....!
We are supposed to meet with Vulcans in 46 years
WoW: Crowcloak (Druid) & Neesheya (Paladin) @ Sylvanas EU (/ˈkaZHo͞oəl/) | GW2: Siqqa (Asura Engineer) @ Piken Square EU
If builders built houses the way programmers built programs,the first woodpecker to come along would destroy civilization. - Weinberg's 2nd law
He seeks them here, he seeks them there, he seeks those lupins everywhere!
Sweden is a good showcase for the rest of the Western world.
It is not reliable source. That's all. I won't discuss it. if wikipedia is not reliable source for many people then why should be some random dude from youtube. Who is he? His education and experience? Statistics are in web, of course they are not perfect, maybe outdated, but still better source for making any opinion. Why should i trust some random person, commentator from youtube? Because you said so? Sorry not enough. "Oh look there's some dude he is from Sweden, hes talking truth. Truth!".Yes - I can link you to more people who debunks that pack of lies if you want, but they would be in swedish.
I came to this topic because someone wrote 5-10 years and muslims will be large majority in Sweden. That's all. And not they won't because if every muslim women in Sweden will born 1 kid every 9 month next 10 years ( you can add even some immigration). You will have 1 milion muslims in Sweden with total population 11M. And it's not even 10% (and its total bs, super nonrealistic situation). When for example 13% population of Russia are muslims and nobody says: Russia is doomed. Some people come to this thread and spreading so much bs its not even funny to point it out.
of what ? country with very well functioning social system that most of countries are jealous of ? and the living conditions level that they wont reach in 20-50 years ?
if you mean those then yes its perfect showcase to most of western world what their goal should be.
lets tel lthe truth if it wasnt for language barrier half of eastrn EU woudl gladly immigrate to Sweden because of living conditons .
Last edited by kamuimac; 2017-03-06 at 02:08 PM.
Socioeconomic status was 3 times more deciding than heritage, which means it explains most of immigrants overrepresentation as well. The rest would probably be due to trauma etc.
No, the claim is usually that violent crime and rape or crime in general has gone up. Nobody is denying that gun violence has gone up. That problem is due to turf wars between gangs. That's where we should focus the discussions, not wether your neighbour with brown skin is bad or not.
Jawohl mein Fuhrer.
- - - Updated - - -
Having read the report where they explicitly state that they are more prone to criminality even when Socio-economic factors are accounted for, So no.
The fact that socio economics is a greater determinant than heritage doesn't refute that claim.
A, most of those gangs are ethnic gangs, and most importantly:No, the claim is usually that violent crime and rape or crime in general has gone up. Nobody is denying that gun violence has gone up. That problem is due to turf wars between gangs. That's where we should focus the discussions, not wether your neighbour with brown skin is bad or not.
That was the claim, then they do not answer that claim, they instead answer four other unrelated questions.Claim: "There has been a major increase in gun violence in Sweden."
That's lying.
Last edited by mmocfd561176b9; 2017-03-06 at 02:22 PM.
This is one of the things that bothers me in discussions about immigration. There's a vocal minority who cares about someones skin color but yet that's the sole focus of many who tries to refute anti-immigrant arguments. It's rather dishonest to presume that your opponent dislikes them based on their skin color.
Why is this guy called Dr. Tino Sanandaji? He's just another far-right bullshitter.
If you google his name you'll see lots of funny anti-immigration crap.